GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > Risk Management - Hazing & etc.
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Risk Management - Hazing & etc. This forum covers Risk Management topics such as: Hazing, Alcohol Abuse/Awareness, Date Rape Awareness, Eating Disorder Prevention, Liability, etc.

» GC Stats
Members: 331,421
Threads: 115,706
Posts: 2,207,562
Welcome to our newest member, iaactopo2037
» Online Users: 2,166
0 members and 2,166 guests
No Members online
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #25  
Old 02-06-2012, 11:16 AM
psusue psusue is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 668
Quote:
Originally Posted by 33girl View Post
Add to all this the fact that the people working at the national HQ may not be in any way shape or form, the people needed to remedy a particular situation. Our national councillors don't live or work at our HQ, and that's who would have taken care of something like this.
Our director of chapter services would have been the person to go to in this situation. That she had correct. What I do not understand is why she did not go first to her chapter adviser (when she claimed she was not being heard out by the process of Honor Council), then to her regional consultant/regional support team, bypassing that potentially if the allegations were serious to the Assistant Director of Chapter Services and later the Director of Chapter Services (which her MOM did eventually get to, but bypassed many layers of support to do so).

I just don't get it. If the allegations were serious, she should have gone directly to her adviser when they began. I also see no notice of her going to the Greek life staff if she really was being abused/hazed. Finally, why have mommy go to the appropriate person months after the fact? There is something missing here, for sure. From reading it, the allegations she was charged with in Honor Council were all legitimate, although they are broad ranging in nature and I don't know if they were founded. I also know that a woman is always allowed to speak for herself during HC proceedings. If that did not occur than she should have gone to the adviser immediately, IMO. Well actually she should have filed for an appeal, which I'm almost 100% positive the adviser attends. I know they attend for level 3 and 4 meetings as well, for sure.


This whole situation puzzles me. I have no idea of the legal case she has. If she really was harassed I don't understand why she stayed. If she wasn't, it doesn't sound like her case would hold up. I can't tell too much detail from the articles and I don't want to prejudge either this woman or any of the other sisters that are involved, but this is just unfortunate all around. Like others have said, it sounds like a bad fit from the get go and just a lot of unpleasantness ever since. I'll reserve other comments until after the trial, if it gets that far. But again, I really hope this is resolved quickly.
__________________
sigma sigma sigma
beta upsilon
ever true
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wrongful Death Lawsuit - U Delaware Sigma Alpha Mu exlurker Risk Management - Hazing & etc. 5 05-25-2009 10:43 AM
Lawsuit Alleges Hazing (Tulane Sigma Alpha Mu) exlurker Risk Management - Hazing & etc. 3 03-21-2009 05:53 PM
Frat Lawsuit Against George Mason Dismissed-Sigma Chi jon1856 Risk Management - Hazing & etc. 1 03-06-2008 02:14 PM
Lawsuit Against Sigma Nu, U. of Southern Mississippi, and Others exlurker Risk Management - Hazing & etc. 15 08-04-2005 09:34 PM
Delta Sigma Phi House Condemmed -- Franklin & Marshall exlurker Risk Management - Hazing & etc. 12 03-16-2005 03:45 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.