I feel like every time we see a historically black, non-nphc organization, they are automatically labeled a ''nphc wanna-be.'' We cannot deny that the organizations which make up the current nphc are the most well know historically black organizations and that , IMO, is a reflection of their success. (I say current because the organizations which make up the nphc itself are liable to change in the future.) However, when we have groups like G Phi G, S Phi S, and after reading this post and the former I will add Wine to that list, who put so much energy and emphases in saying 'no we are not a GLO or no we are not nphc and when we had 140 chapter members on so-n-so campus 30 years ago we were better than the nphc orgs,' they themselves legitimize the claim. Secondly, if they are trying to reorganize then why are their members coming on GC trying to start cyber drama? If you believe your organization is so righteous, and displays the true meaning of brotherhood, then why to you feel the need to amplify the downfalls of others to make yourselves look good? Why not foster the merits of your own org and focus your energies on the good you claim to do. Lastly, your founders had to know that including the acronym W.I.N.E in your name would cause non-members to associate your org with alcohol, so if you want to maintain that this association is a matter of ignorance you should probably point that finger in another direction.
Threaded Mode
