Lavaliering question

[LaneSig]

I'm going to have to say "No" on him lavaliering you. The reason is simple: non-members are not supposed to wear letters from another organization.

The difference: You would be assumed to be a member of Pi Kappa Phi; a female would not.

[DeltaBetaBaby]

Originally Posted by LaneSig

I'm going to have to say "No" on him lavaliering you. The reason is simple: non-members are not supposed to wear letters from another organization.

The difference: You would be assumed to be a member of Pi Kappa Phi; a female would not.

I'm not sure I agree. If we are talking about a traditional letter drop on a chain, that's pretty obviously a lavalier. I have never seen a man wear one with his own letters, and if I did see a man wearing one, I'd probably assume he was in a relationship with a member.

[jthebanks]

Originally Posted by LaneSig

I'm going to have to say "No" on him lavaliering you. The reason is simple: non-members are not supposed to wear letters from another organization.

The difference: You would be assumed to be a member of Pi Kappa Phi; a female would not.

I was asking about lavaliering him, not him lavaliering me.

[MysticCat]

On the alumnus aspect of it: http://www.greekchat.com/gcforums/sh...ad.php?t=44280

On the gay aspect of it: http://www.greekchat.com/gcforums/sh...ad.php?t=99988

Frankly, I've never heard of lavaliering someone with honor society letters. And doesn't it raise the same issue LaneSig raised -- he could be mistaken for a member.