Pledging as a 5th year senior....(serious replies only)

[Drolefille]

Originally Posted by nella5

Drolefille: I can say I have good character.

Sure you can.

It's a fact.

You'd need to operationalize a definition of character first. I can't speak to the accuracy of your comment.

If you can't say anything good about myself, how can I expect any one else too.

I can't say a single thing good about your grammar, so there's that.

Your sarcasm neither helped nor hurt me so your comment was pretty useless.

Yet, since it led to a really amusing thread elsewhere, it was not nearly as useless as your entire post.

And if you're judging such a small part of my post, maybe your character isn't all that great..

Again we need to operationalize the definition here. If your definition of "character" is non-sarcastic, then clearly you're superior to us lowly peons. But such a definition would speak volumes about your scientific education.

am I being sarcastic???

Oh gee whiz I hope not. That would just be terrible.

Maybe.

And passive aggressive.

Good day.

You run along now and ask the internet some more questions that a long line of women with whom you are already acquainted could have answered for you.

[agzg]

Originally Posted by Drolefille

Yet, since it led to a really amusing thread elsewhere, it was not nearly as useless as your entire post.

DrPhil's responses in that thread are the best. I was dying. Live-in thought I lost my mind, so I tried to read them to him, cracked up the entire way, and he didn't get it anyway since he's not acquainted with the particular usernames that post on this particular forum.

Yours were good, too, but both he and I are not particularly fans of the My Little Pony pr0n.

[nella5]

Originally Posted by Drolefille

Sure you can.

You'd need to operationalize a definition of character first. I can't speak to the accuracy of your comment.


I can't say a single thing good about your grammar, so there's that.


Yet, since it led to a really amusing thread elsewhere, it was not nearly as useless as your entire post.


Again we need to operationalize the definition here. If your definition of "character" is non-sarcastic, then clearly you're superior to us lowly peons. But such a definition would speak volumes about your scientific education.


Oh gee whiz I hope not. That would just be terrible.


And passive aggressive.

You run along now and ask the internet some more questions that a long line of women with whom you are already acquainted could have answered for you.

Well that was seriously a waste of your time. It's not because of your sarcasm that I think you have no character. It's the fact that I asked a serious question and you tried to belittle me instead of giving a serious answer. And then for you to have the time to dissect every sentence that I wrote in order to be an idiot, or to get a laugh from somebody. That, along with your complete lack of understanding, is what allows me to measure your character. So go ahead and reply to this with another immature comment so I may measure your character even more.

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by nella5

Well that was seriously a waste of your time. It's not because of your sarcasm that I think you have no character. It's the fact that I asked a serious question and you tried to belittle me instead of giving a serious answer. And then for you to have the time to dissect every sentence that I wrote in order to be an idiot, or to get a laugh from somebody. That, along with your complete lack of understanding, is what allows me to measure your character. So go ahead and reply to this with another immature comment so I may measure your character even more.

We can now see why you're almost a 5th year senior who is still searching for the answer to your extremely basic question. Meanwhile, deserving women who want to be AKAs are handling their business and moving forward.

You have the attention span of a puppy that can't figure out why its excitedly evasive tail keeps running from its mouth no matter how hard it chases it.

[nella5]

Originally Posted by DrPhil

We can now see why you're a 5th year senior who is still searching for the answer to your extremely basic question. Meanwhile, deserving women who want to be AKAs are handling their business and moving forward.

You have the attention span of a puppy that can't figure out why its excitedly evasive tail keeps running from its mouth no matter how hard it chases it.

I'm not a 5th year senior. If your attention span wasn't so short maybe you'd know that.

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by Eternal Aspirant

I'm not a 5th year senior. If your attention span wasn't so short maybe you'd know that.

And yet I still know more than your dumbass will ever know.

LOL @ you knowing that whether you are a 5th year senior is the only thing that needed correction in my post.

[nella5]

Originally Posted by DrPhil

And yet I still know more than your dumbass will ever know.

Hmmm.I guess I hit a nerve.

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by Eternal Aspirant

Hmmm.I guess I hit a nerve.

Because you're the first and the last eternal aspirant (or troll or sock puppet, who knows) to ever type these things on GC. You know you're unique.

[nella5]

Originally Posted by DrPhil

And yet I still know more than your dumbass will ever know.

LOL @ you knowing that whether you are a 5th year senior is the only thing that needed correction in my post.

And for the record I don't feel the need to correct every wrong thing a person says on here, if I did my entire day would be wasted.