Removing a bad president

[33girl]

Originally Posted by TriDeltaSallie

The way I read it is that the recruitment VP should have been removed and wasn't until word leaked out that she hadn't made grades and they were forced to remove her. The president stood in for the recruitment VP during recruitment rather than electing someone else. And because the president didn't know the rules and procedures, the chapter was fined for rush infractions.

Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

That's what I thought on second read too, except the main VP (not the rush vp - she is a third person) was also involved in the cover-up. For some reason though, it's OK that the main VP lied to the sorority.

[TriDeltaSallie]

Originally Posted by 33girl

That's what I thought on second read too, except the main VP (not the rush vp - she is a third person) was also involved in the cover-up. For some reason though, it's OK that the main VP lied to the sorority.

I agree that the VP lying is bad too. But apparently the lying is only one reason why the OP thinks the president needs to be removed.

And maybe she doesn't need to be removed, but just needs guidance. It almost sounds like there isn't a lot of adviser input and that's too bad. I learned so much from my advisers and the national officers I worked with. The leadership training I got through my Tri Delta experience was just as valuable as my college education.