GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 331,938
Threads: 115,724
Posts: 2,208,015
Welcome to our newest member, znatalepetrov14
» Online Users: 2,092
1 members and 2,091 guests
amIblue?
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-11-2011, 01:58 PM
AGDee AGDee is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSUViolet06 View Post
Oh man. I am so sorry.

I'm also REALLY surprised that Texas schools are in the position to lay off Sp. Ed. teachers. That doesn't usually happen (too hard to find/replace.)
I think that will be happening in Michigan too because the gov is cutting the special ed budget by 5% and the regular ed budget only by 4%. Such a good guy.

ETA: It dawned on me. These whacko Republican Governors in these swing states may just help Obama get re-elected in the end.

Last edited by AGDee; 03-11-2011 at 02:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-11-2011, 05:39 PM
bones40 bones40 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGDee View Post
I think that will be happening in Michigan too because the gov is cutting the special ed budget by 5% and the regular ed budget only by 4%. Such a good guy.

ETA: It dawned on me. These whacko Republican Governors in these swing states may just help Obama get re-elected in the end.

Don't bet on it. The wacko union thugs national membership was down to 14% and that was with a Democratic controlled House, Senate and White House. I am probably not as smart as you liberals but I think 86% is bigger than 14%. Most of the country is behind the Wisconsin Governor and Obama is a one term President.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-11-2011, 06:30 PM
AGDee AGDee is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by bones40 View Post
Don't bet on it. The wacko union thugs national membership was down to 14% and that was with a Democratic controlled House, Senate and White House. I am probably not as smart as you liberals but I think 86% is bigger than 14%. Most of the country is behind the Wisconsin Governor and Obama is a one term President.
Read my posts above because the stuff in Michigan isn't about unions. It's about a governor trying to take the power to take over any city or school district that HE deems to be in a financial crisis and fire all of their elected officials and appoint his own manager to that city. Elected officials are NOT unionized.

As to China's education system, they have increased their funding of it by 1% every year since 1998. Education is only compulsory through age 15. It is 100% government run. They spend $2867 per student. Some students only go to agriculture school after age 15, where they learn Chinese, Mathematics and Morals. Students have to take an entrance exam to get into a college prep high school. Is that better? Really?

Our education spending in Michigan has not skyrocketed. It has gone down significantly over the past 3 years. It's been cut more than $2000 in some districts.

Last edited by AGDee; 03-11-2011 at 06:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-12-2011, 08:06 PM
PiKA2001 PiKA2001 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 3,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGDee View Post
Read my posts above because the stuff in Michigan isn't about unions. It's about a governor trying to take the power to take over any city or school district that HE deems to be in a financial crisis and fire all of their elected officials and appoint his own manager to that city. Elected officials are NOT unionized.
I don't get what the big deal is Dee, the state has always had the ability to take over city management during a fiscal or other crisis. During the whole Kwame mess the governor had the option to impeach Kwame and take over the city of Detroit. If that HAD happened it would've been a budget manager out of Lansing who would have been the "mayor" of Detroit. People have been calling for a state takeover of DPS for years as well, it's just that Granholm, while mentioning the option was available, didn't want to get into that hot mess and I don't blame her.

So how is this any different?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-12-2011, 08:12 PM
Psi U MC Vito Psi U MC Vito is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: nasty and inebriated
Posts: 5,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by PiKA2001 View Post
I don't get what the big deal is Dee, the state has always had the ability to take over city management during a fiscal or other crisis. During the whole Kwame mess the governor had the option to impeach Kwame and take over the city of Detroit. If that HAD happened it would've been a budget manager out of Lansing who would have been the "mayor" of Detroit. People have been calling for a state takeover of DPS for years as well, it's just that Granholm, while mentioning the option was available, didn't want to get into that hot mess and I don't blame her.

So how is this any different?
There is a difference from impeaching somebody and just sacking somebody.
__________________
And he took a cup of coffee and gave thanks to God for it, saying, 'Each of you drink from it. This is my caffeine, which gives life.'
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-12-2011, 08:31 PM
PiKA2001 PiKA2001 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 3,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psi U MC Vito View Post
There is a difference from impeaching somebody and just sacking somebody.
True but AFAIK if the state ever did take over the city due to a crisis people elected and appointed would be replaced left and right.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-12-2011, 09:05 PM
AGDee AGDee is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by PiKA2001 View Post
I don't get what the big deal is Dee, the state has always had the ability to take over city management during a fiscal or other crisis. During the whole Kwame mess the governor had the option to impeach Kwame and take over the city of Detroit. If that HAD happened it would've been a budget manager out of Lansing who would have been the "mayor" of Detroit. People have been calling for a state takeover of DPS for years as well, it's just that Granholm, while mentioning the option was available, didn't want to get into that hot mess and I don't blame her.

So how is this any different?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psi U MC Vito View Post
There is a difference from impeaching somebody and just sacking somebody.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PiKA2001 View Post
True but AFAIK if the state ever did take over the city due to a crisis people elected and appointed would be replaced left and right.
There is a huge difference between impeaching a mayor and eliminating the entire city council and disincorporating a city. Additionally, for the governor to impeach that mayor, there are steps required, including a hearing. It doesn't eliminate the whole city as an entity! It would also allow for a new election because there is a secession plan built into a city charter. And an ELECTED city council member would become mayor, not whoever the governor decides to put in charge. Tell me how the following can even happen in a democracy?


Gov. Snyder is seeking emergency powers that would enable him to 1) unilaterally declare a "financial emergency", 2) disincorporate entire municipal governments, 3) dismiss elected officials with no replacement election to follow, 4) seize control of local civil services, 5) hand taxpayer money, services and POWERS to private, for-profit firms.

Last edited by AGDee; 03-12-2011 at 09:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-11-2011, 08:16 PM
Psi U MC Vito Psi U MC Vito is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: nasty and inebriated
Posts: 5,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by bones40 View Post
I am probably not as smart as you
FYP
__________________
And he took a cup of coffee and gave thanks to God for it, saying, 'Each of you drink from it. This is my caffeine, which gives life.'
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Outrage at Funeral Protests Pushes Lawmakers to Act Rudey News & Politics 28 05-04-2006 09:19 PM
Susan L. Taylor Protests Hampton's Policy CrimsonTide4 Delta Sigma Theta 45 04-18-2006 01:38 PM
Protests/Violonce over desecration of Qur'an at Gitmo RACooper News & Politics 50 05-31-2005 04:35 PM
Law Celebrates Mass Despite Protests Rudey News & Politics 6 04-12-2005 11:28 AM
Hong Kong Protests Chinese Rule Rudey News & Politics 1 07-01-2004 01:45 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.