Quote:
Originally Posted by Jen
I was trying to figure out why they didn't vote Holly as well, but couldn't remember the rules of rocks/fire etc.
I prefer when it's the "build fire" scenario, only because I think it's a skill they all should have after this long out there. It has a lot more tension than "pick a rock" I think.
It'll be interesting to see who Jane will vote for if Jud and Dan get picked off and all she's left with is her alliance.
|
I agree - the building a fire challenge is always the most interesting (and most fair).
I say, even if the outcome of voting for Holly wasn't a good one for Jane, Fabio and Dan, they should have done it.
However... my honest opinion is that both Fabio and Dan wanted to "show their allegiance" to the other 3. Let's face it - everyone knew that if they took Jane to the final 3, she'd win. They wanted to get her out eventually. I think both Fabio and Dan thought, "If I vote with them, they'll keep me around a little longer."
However, if I were one of them, I would have voted for either Sash or Chase, knowing that they would have used the HII. Jane, being on the jury, would never think that I voted against her, and I would tell Chase and Sash back at camp that I voted for one of them.. just because. I'd say I knew Jane was going home, so I just wrote down whoever's name. You know the alliance of 3 already has a strategy as to who they're going to vote out, so what would I have to lose by saying that to them? And I could possibly solidify Jane's jury vote if I made it that far.
I was surprised at how honest Chase was, however, he still couldn't just man up and say, "Yes, that's what is happening," without turning to Sash and Holly and saying, "Right?" ... both when they were talking to Jane at camp, and while answering Jeff's questions at tribal council. The only chance that 1 of the 3 of them have to win is if Fabio and Dan are voted out.
All I know is.. they better hope Fabio doesn't any more immunity challenges...
Threaded Mode
