Wikileaks to release more info

[Drolefille]

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter

I believe a good lawyer could make the case that by deliberately giving a foreign national classified documents he was in turn giving aid and comfort to our ememies. It does not state that the aid has to be directly given to our enemies. This may be splitting hairs but isn't that what lawyers do? If assets (read informants/spys/diplomats) were compromised he could be considered to have rendered aid to our enemies. If a soldier loses his/her life due to one or more of these leaked documents that would also be aid to the enemy.

I think it is a moot point though as we, with our current DOJ, don't have the guts to bring him up on treason charges. He will be found guilty of some series of lesser charges and put into prison for the rest of his life. He will become a pariah to most and a hero to the wacky few and every few years there will be an uproar and petition to release him.

Funny how you're talking to a "good lawyer" and still think you know better...

[Ghostwriter]

Originally Posted by Drolefille

Funny how you're talking to a "good lawyer" and still think you know better...

Funny how you try to find things in many (read your posts in other threads) peoples posts to start your little cat fights. I won't play in your litter box.

I presume MC is a good lawyer but really don't know him except through these posts and neither do you. He seems very competent and knowledgable. He and I may disagree but we both know it is not personal. You on the other hand revel in the vitriol. I meant know offense to him and think you know that.

I apologize to MC if he has taken offense to my comment. It was a general statement and not directed to/at him.

[Drolefille]

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter

Funny how you try to find things in many (read your posts in other threads) peoples posts to start your little cat fights. I won't play in your litter box.

Because you're stuck in the sandbox with the other Keyboard Kommandos.

Seriously, you make a post full of assumptions with no backing and then follow it up with your ITG decisiveness while deriding the "current DOJ" for not having the male gonads to do what YOU think should be done. Therefore if they don't do it, it's because they're cowards, not because it's not the right choice. Good to know that you, with your high level government and military experience are here to correct these testicle-lacking wimps.

[Ghostwriter]

Originally Posted by Drolefille

Because you're stuck in the sandbox with the other Keyboard Kommandos.

Seriously, you make a post full of assumptions with no backing and then follow it up with your ITG decisiveness while deriding the "current DOJ" for not having the male gonads to do what YOU think should be done. Therefore if they don't do it, it's because they're cowards, not because it's not the right choice. Good to know that you, with your high level government and military experience are here to correct these testicle-lacking wimps.

Yawn! Your honor, I rest my case.

[Drolefille]

Originally Posted by Ghostwriter

Yawn! Your honor, I rest my case.

Translation: "I can't defend my statements so I'll attack your character and pretend I'm above it all."