Quote:
Originally Posted by Alumiyum
I've just never heard a guy complain about being circumscribed (and yeah, you'd be surprised how many times that topic has come up in conversations where I and other females are present...my friends are odd). And since it doesn't really hurt anything...
|
They do exist, louder since the internet came out. And some do claim negative effects (not side-effects) including reduced sensation. There are actually foreskin restoration procedures, though I have no knowledge of how effective they are.
Is a lack of obvious harm a default approval for the procedure? Again, the clitoral hood would be a similar piece of skin for females, and among other things, it protects the clitoris from being constantly in contact with other objects - the body, clothes, etc. It is claimed that men with foreskins are more sensitive than those without due to the glans being protected from constant contact. Are men without foreskin incapable of sex? Of course not. But it's an example of harm that is neither obvious nor easily quantifiable.
Threaded Mode