Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC
It may seem counterintuitive, but shouldn't the strain go down with a properly-implemented and accounted-for immigration process?
|
This assumes that these "properly implemented and accounted for immigration process[es]" are able to experience any greater degree of success at solving whatever problems exist in the immigrant community that they set out to fix. From my vantage point [yes, anecdotally], government solutions to community problems are not typically successful. For every successful program, e.g., Rural Electrification, we have boondoggles like NCLB.
Your proposal is to essentially solve the problem with newer/better bureaucrats. Wouldn't money be more effectively spent at actually eliminating the problem of illegal immigration altogether (border enforcement), and THEN focusing on meeting our country's need for immigrant labor rather than focusing on meeting the immigrant labor's need for our country?
Isn't the first step to climbing out of a hole you've dug yourself into to stop digging?
Threaded Mode
