|
Understood. Lets look at it this way. Just because a house doesn't drink or haze doesn't mean that their charter will be taken. I have seen instances where our house was in jeopardy for other things beyond those two things. We recently went to a Risk Managment speaker (forgot his name, but was a judge) and he spoke about those things. They don't apply to us. Not in the least. We don't drink at all. We don't haze at all. There is still risk managment. Just other things. To treat a chapter like other chapters is not smart. We have problems, but not like any other chapter I've seen. A broader range of "Risk Managment Issues need to be realized in order to make our organizations safer. Why though? There will always be stupid decisions made by smart people. I just hate to see people blame things on organizations than take matters up with "the victim". Really the main argument is the scope needs to be broader if you are going to crack down on things
|
Threaded Mode