GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 329,771
Threads: 115,673
Posts: 2,205,414
Welcome to our newest member, Lindatced
» Online Users: 4,508
1 members and 4,507 guests
IllyPolly
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old 04-20-2010, 09:08 AM
MysticCat MysticCat is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil View Post
Plenty of politicans see them as interest groups.
LOL. Plenty of politicians see everyone as interest groups.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elephant Walk View Post
While it has, that doesn't make it right nor Constitutional even if it's no longer argued.

Whats the Thomas Paine quote "A long standing tradition of thinking something right, it becomes right." (that's absolutely not verbatim)
No I see your point, and I understand it's one that more people than just you hold. My point is simply that the judiciary in general and the Supreme Court in particular -- the branch of government that has the responsibility and authority to decide whether statutes and executive actions are constitutional or not -- has said that this way of doing things is constitutional. Plenty of people can and will disagree with them, but unless the Supreme Court changes its mind, it's probably not much more than a theoretical argument.

Quote:
Sorry, I was thinking of the courts. The Congress has alot more audacity. The courts have only overturned two.
I was thinking of the courts, too. The courts have overturned lots of federal regulations over the years.

There would be no reason for the courts to overturn this particular action by the President (which isn't, I've realized on looking at it again, even an executive order -- it's a memorandum to the Secretary of Health and Human Services). It doesn't do anything other than ask the Secretary to begin to the rulemaking process and to make additional recommmendations back to the president. There's nothing to challenge in court there, because no final action is taken. The challenge would appropriately come when regulations are actually promulgated and are being enforced. Then an entity subject to those regulations could sue, alleging that the rules exceed the authority given DHHS by Congress.

Since I'm not sure it's been linked anywhere in this thread, here is the President's memo.
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
1898
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Denying HS Diploma Because of Cheers? Penalty too Harsh? AKA2D '91 Alpha Kappa Alpha 34 05-30-2008 04:17 PM
Wal-Mart Accused of Denying Lunch Breaks Jill1228 News & Politics 13 09-21-2005 06:09 AM
Homecoming Partners flirt5721 Greek Life 15 07-20-2005 03:25 AM
Number of Partners BabyP Dating & Relationships 2 07-14-2004 10:01 AM
Orders? SH80 Greek Life 9 06-09-2001 04:39 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.