Quote:
Originally Posted by xp2k
of course they do if you take them out of context, for example:
I said no such thing...
anyway:
I said Zeta won fair and square, as in they performed a routine and the judges voted it the best. As far as I know Zeta didnt bribe anyone...break another team's member's leg...or give someone food poisoning...
My point was that their show wasnt without flaws, but it was definitely competitive.
Plenty of performances in judged competitions WIN that arent perfect.
Ask anyone who's done figure skating, gymnastics, diving...even marching band...there's always that competition where someone wins with "ok" because they did ok very well rather than doing something new.
|
Yes, but that still doesnt explain how they scored well concerning creativity. If a show lacks craetivity, then I would argue that it was not "definitely competitive."