Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
Sorry guys, but Barbie's Rush has a reasonable point -- that presumably all of our founders had valid reasons for wanting to start new organizations whether 150 years ago or 15 years ago. If there were valid reasons to want to start a new org 15 years ago, why is it completely unthinkable that there might be a valid reason to start a new org now?
The OP didn't say why she thinks she should start a new org, although her "I thought why not start a new one" did sound a bit less than thoughtful and similar to other threads we've seen lately. But it is possible that she has a good a reason as any of our founders, including the founders of newer organizations. And I think that's all Barbie's Rush was saying.
|
true, but saying this
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barbie's_Rush
2010 is no different than 1997 than 1900 than 1875.
|
was prolly the stupidest way to say it. and THEN on top of that to try to call out younger orgs just shot her credibility to hell and makes her come off as an asshole.
Threaded Mode
