» GC Stats |
Members: 330,693
Threads: 115,701
Posts: 2,207,308
|
Welcome to our newest member, Albertvusty |
|
 |

01-20-2010, 10:15 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Santa Monica/Beverly Hills
Posts: 8,642
|
|
I guess women are doing what men used to do...marrying their trophy husbands! I am one of the women in that group that makes more than my husband (an order of magnitude more!) but it's not due to education...he's getting his fellowship and I just did a residency. When he's done, though, he'll still only make a little less than half of what I do. Women have come a long way in earning potential from the times when we could be fired just for getting married. I think that was the point of this article.
__________________
AOII
One Motto, One Badge, One Bond and Singleness of Heart!
|

01-20-2010, 10:31 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,733
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AOII Angel
Women have come a long way in earning potential from the times when we could be fired just for getting married. I think that was the point of this article.
|
Yes, if a within-gender analysis of getting fired just for getting married is the metric then women have definitely come a long way. I consider the real metric to be an across-gender analysis of how well our incomes and careers compare to men. In that regard, and in general, we have not come as far as we are led to believe. A household such as yours is the exception.
 I completely see why you consider that to be the point of article. I saw a different point. So, it's definitely in the eye of the beholder which is perfect for the NY Times.
|

01-20-2010, 10:34 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Santa Monica/Beverly Hills
Posts: 8,642
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
Yes, if a within-gender analysis of getting fired just for getting married is the metric then women have definitely come a long way. I consider the real metric to be an across-gender analysis of how well our incomes and careers compare to men. In that regard, and in general, we have not come as far as we are led to believe. A household such as yours is the exception.
 I completely see why you consider that to be the point of article. I saw a different point. So, it's definitely in the eye of the beholder which is perfect for the NY Times.
|
I agree that we still have a long way to go. Women still make $0.77 on the dollar of what men make for the same job, but just a short 40 years ago, women with law degrees were expected to work as secretaries.
__________________
AOII
One Motto, One Badge, One Bond and Singleness of Heart!
|

01-20-2010, 10:47 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,733
|
|
Precisely, Angel.
And today women with law degrees can still be found getting coffee and doing office assistant things for the men in law offices.
Awwwww, women are such nurturers. It's part of our DNA.
|

01-20-2010, 04:49 PM
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 18,669
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
Precisely, Angel.
And today women with law degrees can still be found getting coffee and doing office assistant things for the men in law offices.
Awwwww, women are such nurturers. It's part of our DNA. 
|
That goes both ways.
I'm the only one allowed to make the coffee 'round here. Everyone else does it wrong.
__________________
SN -SINCE 1869-
"EXCELLING WITH HONOR"
S N E T T
Mu Tau 5, Central Oklahoma
|

01-20-2010, 04:56 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,733
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin
That goes both ways.
I'm the only one allowed to make the coffee 'round here. Everyone else does it wrong.
|
Yet, what happens more often than not is more important than the exceptions.
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|