GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 331,930
Threads: 115,724
Posts: 2,208,006
Welcome to our newest member, asydneygogletz4
» Online Users: 2,185
0 members and 2,185 guests
No Members online
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20  
Old 11-30-2009, 02:57 PM
Ghostwriter Ghostwriter is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: West of East Central North Carolina
Posts: 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat View Post
Frauds? Seems like the wrong word to me. For it to have been a fraud, you have to show that there was intentional deceit. There is a difference between fraud and incomplete understanding.

On the other hand, how do we know there are not human activities that are negatively exaccerbating global warming? Why do you reject "manmade global warming"? Is it on the basis of scientific evidence (or lack thereof), or is it for some other reason?

There are agendas (and $$$$) driving both sides of the debate -- I don't see how that can be denied without buying into one agenda or the other.
The data on DDT was fraudulently arrived at and was never properly vetted. Freon and the data supporting the ozone layer shrinking is very very questionable. When one doctor's, deletes or avoids opposing information while performing a "scientific" study I call it fraud. Ths is a true case of deceit on the part of the researchers at East Anglia University in England. Do you disagree? You cannot omit data that does not support your view. Sample sizes must be properly obtained so the margin of error is reasonable. Manipulated or incomplete data is worthless unless you are only trying to prove your POV at the expense of true scientific research.

I just don't believe we are "smart" enough or "dumb" enough to change nature. If we wanted to change the Earth's temperature in either direction (cooler or hotter) I do not believe we could so so. 30 years ago we were in a "global cooling" trend according to the environmentalist. When the data changed the hue and cry changed.

Soo, that is true with everything. But in this case we are accepting the environmentalist agenda without question and failing to properly vet the reports and studies that "support" the view that man is the reason for global warming.

My agenda is that I have seen man go overboard pandering to the environmental extremist and I am very concerned where this new effort and the multi billions or trillions of $$$ that will be extorted from us will take our country.

During the time the Earth has existed we have had numerous changes in the climate. Both cooling and warming. Many of these changes occured prior to man inhabiting the Earth. The data is incomplete and the timeframes are too narrow.

Follow th money!!!!
__________________
A fool and his money are soon elected. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Global Warming - Fact or Fiction? fullertongreek Chit Chat 42 05-29-2007 07:28 PM
Time/CBS on Global Warming... DeltAlum News & Politics 5 03-28-2006 06:45 PM
Further proof: global warming is a hoax hoosier News & Politics 6 06-08-2005 01:32 PM
Air Farce Alum Dies bcdphie Entertainment 5 11-17-2004 07:03 PM
Global Warming? Tom Earp Chit Chat 0 02-01-2004 11:59 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.