Injustice to the Bruhs at Southern U.?

[the411]

Originally posted by Blackwatch
By the411...

This was obviously logic inspired (or blinded) by Coleman Love
How would you expect any man to respond to this? While you admit that the tearing of the check was wrong, you actually believe the Alphas instigated the fight? Let's be reasonable now.

Point well taken. As per the 1st sentence of my post, I do acknowledge and admit that the Bruhs were wrong. BUT-- not even you can deny that, once the check was snatched and torn, there was obviously nothing the Alphas could do with with--so why feel the need to snatch it back in that same aggressive fashion?

I'm ain't eeeven gon' lie to ya--I'd have probably done the same thing the Alphas did, but my actions still wouldn't be correct, even if they were understandable. Fact is, most fights become fights because someone chooses not to turn the other cheek.

It's kinda like in basketball, when one player jabs another player--the instigator gets hit with a technical, UNLESS the other player retaliates, in which case there's a double technical. I am not faulting the Alphas alone--my argument is that, since the groups were fighting each other, they should both face some sanctions, even if those given to the Alphas are less severe than those given to my Bruhs.

And, as for me being blinded by Coleman Love--Guilty as charged!