Quote:
Originally Posted by ThetaPrincess24
So in the meantime,I am all for restrictions being in place: parental notification for minors wishing to have an abortion and be placed on any form of birth control that includes hormones and a medical procedure (such as implants & IUD),
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhoenixAzul
I think this would be counterproductive. I'm thinking back to how I was at 16, and even though my parents are great people and we have an open relationship, I would have been HORRIFIED to ask them, "Hey mom/dad, I really want pills so I can have sex with my boyfriend, but I need you to sign this paper and take time off of work to take me to the clinic so I can get them."
|
As a parent, I'm going with ThetaPrincess on this one. My child's school can't give my kid an aspirin without my permission, but someone can perform a surgical procedure or give my child much more potent drugs without my knowledge, much less my permission? Include safeguards where the child can bypass parental consent where truly appropriate and necessary, but if the kid's a minor, then the kid's a minor and her parents are responsible for her.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SWTXBelle
I would hope that as educated, articulate and involved members of GLOS we would of course be civil. Except when it comes to AI (ducks)! 
|
I can hear my daughter now: "Oh no you di - nt!"
Quote:
|
Any other thoughts or insights?
|
Only what I said earlier -- that the terms are vague or fluid enough that they can mean whatever respondents want them to mean.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SydneyK
I don't think MC meant for the smoking analogy to be taken this way. His analogy, as I understood it, was simply to explain why the anti-abortion/pro-abortion label was flawed.
Pro-X means you're for X, in and of itself. Because you believe someone has the right to do X doesn't mean you like X.
|
Exactly! Pro-abortion means you favor abortion. That is
quite a different assertion from saying that you believe that the government has a more-or-less limited role in prohibiting abortions. I think agzg hit the nail on the head:
Quote:
Originally Posted by agzg
It's ok to call pro-life viewpoints anti-abortion I guess but "pro-abortion" for someone who is pro-choice insinuates that that person would like a free-for-all policy on abortion including late term abortions, encouraged abortions and unsafe practices which is just not true (for the bulk of us that are pro-choice).
|
And frankly, I think it's an intentional insinuation -- not by SWTXBelle necessary, but by many who would ban abortions. It's a standard political tactic -- skew public opinion of those who oppose you by caricaturing their position. Don't want to outlaw abortions? Then obviously you're in favor of abortions.
I'm content to let people and groups choose for themselves what descriptor is accurate for them.