GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 331,938
Threads: 115,724
Posts: 2,208,015
Welcome to our newest member, znatalepetrov14
» Online Users: 2,666
4 members and 2,662 guests
fmanning, LaneSig, Mooch279
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-20-2009, 01:49 AM
moe.ron moe.ron is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Southeast Asia
Posts: 9,027
Send a message via AIM to moe.ron
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zephyrus View Post
If Bush wouldn't have gotten rid of Saddam, then he would have attacked Israel and that's when the sht would have hit the fking fan.
Wha? I've herd of WMD and Democracy argument, but never herd of this one.
__________________
Spambot Killer
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-20-2009, 04:12 AM
Zephyrus Zephyrus is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by moe.ron View Post
Wha? I've herd of WMD and Democracy argument, but never herd of this one.
WTF??? You don't think Saddam would have attacked Israel???
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-20-2009, 05:19 AM
moe.ron moe.ron is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Southeast Asia
Posts: 9,027
Send a message via AIM to moe.ron
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zephyrus View Post
WTF??? You don't think Saddam would have attacked Israel???
Uhm, no . . . he couldn't even attack the Kurd area. You really think he could've attacked Israel? With what weaponry? Let me guess, the WMD that could've hit Europe in 45 minutes?
__________________
Spambot Killer
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-21-2009, 12:33 AM
Zephyrus Zephyrus is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by moe.ron View Post
Uhm, no . . . he couldn't even attack the Kurd area. You really think he could've attacked Israel? With what weaponry? Let me guess, the WMD that could've hit Europe in 45 minutes?
He probably wouldn't be successful at it, but all it would take is an attempt on his part to cause a war.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-21-2009, 01:54 PM
kstar kstar is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: University of Oklahoma, Noman, Oklahoma
Posts: 848
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zephyrus View Post
He probably wouldn't be successful at it, but all it would take is an attempt on his part to cause a war.
And it would take Israel less than 6 days to shut him down, we've been there 6 YEARS.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-22-2009, 02:24 AM
Zephyrus Zephyrus is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by kstar View Post
And it would take Israel less than 6 days to shut him down, we've been there 6 YEARS.
There really was a six day war back in 1967 (not with Iraq) I think, but that was then. The times are different now. We're there and we will stay there, and that's what you're not comprehending. It was that way post WWII. We went to Germany, fought in Germany, and stayed there, as well as other European countries. Bush is not getting enough credit for his actions in Iraq. Personally, I think Bush was way underrated and Obama is way overrated. C'mon, the dude got praised like he saved the whole fking world before he even made it to the white house.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-22-2009, 05:32 PM
kstar kstar is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: University of Oklahoma, Noman, Oklahoma
Posts: 848
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zephyrus View Post
There really was a six day war back in 1967 (not with Iraq) I think, but that was then. The times are different now. We're there and we will stay there, and that's what you're not comprehending. It was that way post WWII. We went to Germany, fought in Germany, and stayed there, as well as other European countries. Bush is not getting enough credit for his actions in Iraq. Personally, I think Bush was way underrated and Obama is way overrated. C'mon, the dude got praised like he saved the whole fking world before he even made it to the white house.
I said that to make a point. I'm glad you at least got the reference, so why do you seem so uneducated about what is going on now?

I give Bush credit, credit for killing innocent Iraqi civilians. Credit for becoming the aggressor and making military moves based on false accusations. Credit for making America the laughing stock of the world. Credit for taking a balanced budget with a surplus, and turning it into a financial crisis. Is that the type of credit you think he deserves, because that is all the credit I will give him.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-23-2009, 01:19 AM
moe.ron moe.ron is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Southeast Asia
Posts: 9,027
Send a message via AIM to moe.ron
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zephyrus View Post
He probably wouldn't be successful at it, but all it would take is an attempt on his part to cause a war.
There is no evidence whatsoever that he had the ability or even the intention to attack Israel. There was more evidence that WMD was in Iraq and he could've sent the WMD to europe in 45 minutes, which was all false and close to lies.
__________________
Spambot Killer
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-23-2009, 01:30 AM
Zephyrus Zephyrus is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by moe.ron View Post
There is no evidence whatsoever that he had the ability or even the intention to attack Israel. There was more evidence that WMD was in Iraq and he could've sent the WMD to europe in 45 minutes, which was all false and close to lies.
Yeah, it was then. Who's to say what would happen in the future. kstar doesn't have a fcking clue. We've got bases set up in Iraq now, and we're not leaving. So far this has been the most expensive war in U.S. history, and right now, people don't agree. I can't say I'm all for every decision Bush has made, just like any other president. What I am saying is, this all seems fcked up now, but I think people will appreciate what he did in the future. You also have to take in account that the govt. isn't going to tell us everything. They know a whole shit load of stuff we'll never know. Bush wanted to go in and root out terrorism, and he started with Iraq. I think he should have started with Saudi Arabia. Those assholes are no allies of ours. Most of the countries in the mideast hate the U.S. anyway. Who was responsible for 911? Those guys were all fking Saudis, dude. What did you expect Bush to do? Sit on his hands and do nothing? Those fkers in the mideast have been fighting over the same bullshit since the beginning of time. I would like to take out that whole region. They're fcking evil.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-23-2009, 01:47 AM
moe.ron moe.ron is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Southeast Asia
Posts: 9,027
Send a message via AIM to moe.ron
I'm amazed . . . truly amazed.
__________________
Spambot Killer
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Iraq war. AXEAM News & Politics 52 04-21-2006 02:05 PM
Lord Goldsmith's Papers on Iraq - Trouble for Blair over the legality of the Iraq War RACooper News & Politics 12 06-19-2005 09:58 PM
greetings from iraq SPC_LZ Theta Nu Xi 0 02-13-2004 05:40 PM
War on Iraq? Maybe not... Betarulz! Cool Sites 1 02-16-2003 03:33 PM
war on Iraq? hendrixski News & Politics 48 01-09-2003 11:21 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.