Quote:
Originally Posted by epchick
Well most people are spending less, but they don't get a yearly bonus. Why should it be different for these people, especially when the head honchos asked for money to keep them afloat?
The way I read it, it sounded as if Guiliani meant to say it as a do-or-die scenario. That if these people don't get their bonuses the economy is gonna go down even more, and that unemployment is gonna skyrocket.
|
I read it more as Giuliani talking about the trickle-down scenario that Munchkin described (I think, quite accurately).
Hybrid Mode
