GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 329,865
Threads: 115,685
Posts: 2,206,996
Welcome to our newest member, zsophiatxaxdo25
» Online Users: 2,091
2 members and 2,089 guests
cricketKag, JohnnyxDow
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-30-2009, 07:34 PM
CrackerBarrel CrackerBarrel is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: In Mombasa, in a bar room drinking gin.
Posts: 896
Dumb idea. There are executives out there that are worth what they're being paid. If you enforce an artificially low salary and ban bonuses these companies are going to wind up in even worse shape because the talent at the top will leave to go to companies that don't have the restrictions (be it non-bailed out firms, foreign firms with major US presence, etc.). An exodus of management isn't going to help anyone.
__________________
"I put my mama on her, she threw her in the air. My mama said son, that's a mother buckin' mare."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-30-2009, 07:42 PM
Senusret I Senusret I is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrackerBarrel View Post
Dumb idea. There are executives out there that are worth what they're being paid. If you enforce an artificially low salary and ban bonuses these companies are going to wind up in even worse shape because the talent at the top will leave to go to companies that don't have the restrictions (be it non-bailed out firms, foreign firms with major US presence, etc.). An exodus of management isn't going to help anyone.
I agree with that.

The word "socialism" popped into my head when I first heard about this, and whether I am applying the word properly or not, that's what I thought.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-31-2009, 07:30 PM
DaemonSeid DaemonSeid is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: In a house.
Posts: 9,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrackerBarrel View Post
Dumb idea. There are executives out there that are worth what they're being paid. If you enforce an artificially low salary and ban bonuses these companies are going to wind up in even worse shape because the talent at the top will leave to go to companies that don't have the restrictions (be it non-bailed out firms, foreign firms with major US presence, etc.). An exodus of management isn't going to help anyone.
Where are they gonna go when supposedly there are no jobs to be had?
__________________
Law and Order: Gotham - “In the Criminal Justice System of Gotham City the people are represented by three separate, yet equally important groups. The police who investigate crime, the District Attorneys who prosecute the offenders, and the Batman. These are their stories.”
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-31-2009, 07:37 PM
CrackerBarrel CrackerBarrel is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: In Mombasa, in a bar room drinking gin.
Posts: 896
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaemonSeid View Post
Where are they gonna go when supposedly there are no jobs to be had?
There are always jobs at the top if you're one of the best at what you do. If top talent at that level becomes available you do what it takes to get them, so while there may not be a whole lot of hunting for new young talent, if someone becomes available as a lateral hire and has good, proven credentials I guarantee you they won't be on the job market for long.

Another way to look at it: when firms want to save money in tough economic times they cut production and layoff at the bottom. When's the last time you heard of a company announce that in the interests of cutting cost they were eliminating their corporate governance positions?
__________________
"I put my mama on her, she threw her in the air. My mama said son, that's a mother buckin' mare."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-31-2009, 07:41 PM
DaemonSeid DaemonSeid is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: In a house.
Posts: 9,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrackerBarrel View Post
There are always jobs at the top if you're one of the best at what you do. If top talent at that level becomes available you do what it takes to get them, so while there may not be a whole lot of hunting for new young talent, if someone becomes available as a lateral hire and has good, proven credentials I guarantee you they won't be on the job market for long.

Another way to look at it: when firms want to save money in tough economic times they cut production and layoff at the bottom. When's the last time you heard of a company announce that in the interests of cutting cost they were eliminating their corporate governance positions?
Well don't be surprised when you start hearing this now.
__________________
Law and Order: Gotham - “In the Criminal Justice System of Gotham City the people are represented by three separate, yet equally important groups. The police who investigate crime, the District Attorneys who prosecute the offenders, and the Batman. These are their stories.”
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-31-2009, 07:51 PM
CrackerBarrel CrackerBarrel is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: In Mombasa, in a bar room drinking gin.
Posts: 896
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaemonSeid View Post
Well don't be surprised when you start hearing this now.
It'll be the same way it always been, you may some changes in who holds the positions as people are replaced if the company is struggling or top of the line talent becomes available, but as long as the company exists that's a pretty stable job market. There aren't more executive positions being created and there aren't executive positions being eliminated, its how corporations are structured and the only changes are which individuals hold which jobs. And if struggling companies are restricted to paying less, their top talent will be hired up at companies which are faring better. The proposed solution here would be about equivalent to a sports league assigning a salary cap to the worst teams in the league but letting the front runners keep on spending with a big budget. All that happens is the good talent which was on the struggling teams will be hired up at the teams which can pay them what they're worth.
__________________
"I put my mama on her, she threw her in the air. My mama said son, that's a mother buckin' mare."

Last edited by CrackerBarrel; 01-31-2009 at 07:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-31-2009, 07:55 PM
PhiGam PhiGam is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Potbelly's
Posts: 1,289
The $400,000 is fine as long as they are also payed with stock. This way the success of the company is tied to how much money they make.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ok make that 2 more!! ZetaPhi708 Lambda Chi Alpha 5 01-15-2009 01:35 AM
Looking to make an example out of us bubblegum Risk Management - Hazing & etc. 15 02-12-2005 03:25 PM
Make a Wish ChiOqt Chi Omega 8 10-26-2003 03:34 AM
Make-A-Wish Hootie Chi Omega 1 08-19-2001 02:54 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.