|
I agree that his moves haven't been unexpected. They can't sit there and grill CEOs about what cuts/freezes they are making without making some themselves. These are belt tightening times.
I am disappointed that he has changed his words on lobbyists. His first statements were that there would be no lobbyists hired into his administration and they were talking on Meet the Press today that he has backpedaled on that. I'm not totally anti-lobbyists because I think they are necessary to some extent. Our own umbrella organizations have lobbyists working to try to get donations for housing to be tax deductible. I think many go too far and have too much power and control though.
I'm a little tired of the 100 days evaluation period. I'm concerned that it pushes them to try to make sweeping changes immediately and I'm not sure that's it always good to "rush" into things that way. But, it has become a measure. At this point, he can really only deal with things that are executive orders because it takes Congress forever to pass just about everything.
And a random thought not attached to this thread, really... I probably become most frustrated with the way the House and Senate throw extra, unrelated items onto some bills to either get something else passed or to kill a bill. That practice seems shady to me and can give opponents in elections too much fodder for attacks.
|
Threaded Mode
