GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 331,105
Threads: 115,704
Posts: 2,207,373
Welcome to our newest member, Stevenhetry
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-26-2008, 07:08 PM
preciousjeni preciousjeni is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NooYawk
Posts: 5,482
Send a message via AIM to preciousjeni
On another note, why do unions push to establish themselves in companies where the workers don't want them?
__________________
ONE LOVE, For All My Life

Talented, tested, tenacious, and true...
A woman of diversity through and through.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-26-2008, 07:25 PM
UGAalum94 UGAalum94 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by preciousjeni View Post
On another note, why do unions push to establish themselves in companies where the workers don't want them?
And what about the getting rid of the secret ballot part of "card check" stuff? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employee_Free_Choice_Act It's kind of funny that this is in the Chambliss/Martin runoff ads since Georgia is a right to work state. I guess Chambliss is depending on anti-union sentiment.

It just seems odd to me that if the union offers clear benefits to workers than you'd need public pressure to get people to support it. Secret ballot ought to get the job done.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-01-2008, 05:11 PM
madmax madmax is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by preciousjeni View Post
On another note, why do unions push to establish themselves in companies where the workers don't want them?

Why do non union scabs participate in union bashing of companies where the workers do want unions?

Last edited by madmax; 12-01-2008 at 05:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-01-2008, 05:36 PM
preciousjeni preciousjeni is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NooYawk
Posts: 5,482
Send a message via AIM to preciousjeni
Quote:
Originally Posted by madmax View Post
Why do non union scabs participate in union bashing of companies where the workers do want unions?
Ah you wisely edited your post. I was going to say, I suppose it would be hard for me to be a scab as I've never personally been involved with a company that had unions... plus the fact that my mother has been part of the same union for oh I don't know...decades? So, my livelihood was essentially dependent on the work she (and they on her behalf) did.

Try better next time.
__________________
ONE LOVE, For All My Life

Talented, tested, tenacious, and true...
A woman of diversity through and through.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-01-2008, 05:55 PM
madmax madmax is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by preciousjeni View Post
Ah you wisely edited your post. I was going to say, I suppose it would be hard for me to be a scab as I've never personally been involved with a company that had unions... plus the fact that my mother has been part of the same union for oh I don't know...decades? So, my livelihood was essentially dependent on the work she (and they on her behalf) did.

Try better next time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by preciousjeni View Post
Low skilled + overtime + union backing = the salary they make. I get that.

ETA: No one "deserves" any salary. We all have a market value and some of us have artificial values assigned to us whether it's through union backing, government assigned salary grades, etc.

Does that mean your mom is overpaid and unskilled?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-01-2008, 06:10 PM
preciousjeni preciousjeni is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NooYawk
Posts: 5,482
Send a message via AIM to preciousjeni
Quote:
Originally Posted by madmax View Post
Does that mean your mom is overpaid and unskilled?
I see you missed the entire conversation. Let me get you up to speed. We're talking about UAW members working at the Big Three automakers. Hope that helps.
__________________
ONE LOVE, For All My Life

Talented, tested, tenacious, and true...
A woman of diversity through and through.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-02-2008, 05:11 PM
epchick epchick is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: a little here and a little there
Posts: 4,837
Don't know if this was posted yet, but I just saw this:

Ford CEO will work for $1 a year if the gov't bails him out

I know the media skews things, but in this article you could see the differences between the 3 CEOs. Although I don't know if his approach is the best---like how about he gets rid of some of his money instead of taking it out on all the Ford employees around the country--but at least he has a plan. It doesn't seem like GM & Chrysler have one.

I'm still holding out that I can get my Ford Edge for dirt cheap, but I think i'll be waiting a long time for that! lol.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-02-2008, 09:29 PM
AGDee AGDee is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,845
They all have plans. They are all driving hybrids to Washington this time. They have each agreed to being paid $1 a year. The higher ups with the UAW met today to discuss concessions including getting rid of the job bank (where essentially guys get laid off, are in the "job bank" and get 95% of their pay while in the job bank.. some have been in the job bank for over a year). GM's plan is to ditch Saturn and Pontiac (which kills me because they are my two favorites and I'm about to buy a Saturn Vue so I have no idea who will service it, honor the warranty, etc.). Chrysler just offered buy out packages to every white collar worker. They had to decide by last Wednesday whether to take it and many took it. Wednesday was their last day. Monday, almost every employee had a different job. I haven't heard final figures, but I've talked to people whose departments were cut by 75% through this buy out. Congress has all the plans now and the execs will be there later this week.

Details can be found here: http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/18191115/detail.html

Mulally and Wagoner both said they'd work for $1 per year -- something Chrysler's plan said Nardelli already does -- if their firms took any government loan money, while Ford offered to cancel management bonuses and salaried employees' merit raises next year, and GM said it would slash top executives' pay. Ford and GM both said they would sell their corporate aircraft.

The unions were preparing to make sacrifices as well. United Auto Workers leaders summoned local union leaders from across the country to an emergency meeting Wednesday in Detroit to discuss possible concessions. Up for discussion were the possibility of scrapping a much-maligned jobs bank in which laid-off workers keep receiving most of their pay and postponing the automakers' payments into a multibillion-dollar union-administered health care fund.

GM said it would make huge cuts in its numbers of workers as well as reductions in its vehicle brands and plants by 2012. The auto giant is seeking a $12 billion loan to keep it running, plus a $6 billion line of credit in case market conditions worsen.

GM would focus on four brands -- Chevrolet, GMC, Buick and Cadillac. By 2012, the plan calls for 20,000 to 30,000 fewer workers, a reduction of nine facilities and 1,750 fewer dealers.

The company also outlined efforts to negotiate swapping some of the company's debt for equity stakes in the automaker.

Chrysler said it would cut costs by slashing employee benefits -- including suspending its match portion of the 401(k) retirement plan and reducing its health care contribution for salaried workers -- and terminating its lease car program. It said it would also ask more productivity of each employee.

Chrysler's product plan includes the first full-function electric-drive model in 2010 and expansion to additional models by 2013. The company's market penetration of electric-drive vehicles will further increase with over 500,000 produced by 2013, the blueprint said.

Last edited by AGDee; 12-02-2008 at 09:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-02-2008, 09:58 PM
preciousjeni preciousjeni is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NooYawk
Posts: 5,482
Send a message via AIM to preciousjeni
AGDee, thanks for posting! I'm really impressed with what they're doing.
__________________
ONE LOVE, For All My Life

Talented, tested, tenacious, and true...
A woman of diversity through and through.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-03-2008, 03:45 PM
madmax madmax is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGDee View Post
They all have plans..
Are the plans to get the bailout money or to improve the companies? At this point the execs have no credibility in my book. If they were sincere then they would have implemented the plans before it got to this point.


Hey look at us, we drove hybrids. Now can we have the 25 billion?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Senators grill oil company execs over huge profits... DeltAlum News & Politics 23 05-24-2008 01:22 AM
theta chi pewter cups on eBay kappa2 Theta Chi 0 06-30-2007 08:15 PM
Union Hand in Hand in Greek Jen Alpha Phi 3 06-27-2005 08:44 PM
Chinese Jets Land in Taiwan After 56 Years PhiPsiRuss News & Politics 1 01-29-2005 02:18 PM
Fellow Sisterfriends: Hand Out or Hand Up ENDROAD Alpha Kappa Alpha 45 07-28-2003 05:27 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.