» GC Stats |
Members: 329,742
Threads: 115,668
Posts: 2,205,115
|
Welcome to our newest member, jaksontivanovz2 |
|
 |

08-27-2008, 10:36 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NooYawk
Posts: 5,478
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SydneyK
I agree with MC regarding declining or avoiding extraordinary means of sustaining life. My husband and I both have DNRs in place, and our parents have been informed of our decisions (DNR, organ donation, creamation, etc...).
In addition, I also believe that, if an adult of sound mind is diagnosed with a terminal disease which causes great suffering, that adult should have the option of physician assisted suicide (PAS). I know if I were faced with a terminal condition that caused tremendous suffering, I would want all options, including PAS, available to me. (I realize I'm vague in precisely the areas I need to be clearest - "sound mind", "great suffering", an abundance of "ifs", etc... perhaps if this thread takes off I'll take the time to remedy all that. My opinion still remains: I believe it is morally acceptable to pursue PAS in certain circumstances.)
|
I agree here. If you want to kill yourself, you should have the right to do so.
Personally, I'd rather be dead. I'm not depressed by any means and I would not commit suicide, but I've lived enough life and I'm ready to go anytime the Lord wants to take me.  I do not want to be resuscitated under any circumstances although I do not have a formal order out there. My family knows my feelings on it although they brought me back from the brink of death in 2002. I was not happy.
__________________
ONE LOVE, For All My Life
Talented, tested, tenacious, and true...
A woman of diversity through and through.
|

08-27-2008, 10:47 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,731
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by preciousjeni
I agree here. If you want to kill yourself, you should have the right to do so.
|
Maybe I'm straining at gnats here, but is there a difference between having a "right" to do something (at least legally) and it being ethical to do something? I think there probably is.
Quote:
. . . but I've lived enough life and I'm ready to go anytime the Lord wants to take me.
|
I think that's why I have a problem with it . . . physician-assisted suicide/euthanasia makes it my decision as to when, not the Lord's. Even if I might legally have the right to decide when I will die, ethically (or religiously, if you prefer), I do not think I have any such right at all.
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
18▲98
|

08-27-2008, 10:54 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: In a house.
Posts: 9,564
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
Maybe I'm straining at gnats here, but is there a difference between having a "right" to do something (at least legally) and it being ethical to do something? I think there probably is.
I think that's why I have a problem with it . . . physician-assisted suicide/euthanasia makes it my decision as to when, not the Lord's. Even if I might legally have the right to decide when I will die, ethically (or religiously, if you prefer), I do not think I have any such right at all.
|
thanks for bringing that up...I actually meant to put right in quotes when I posted this originally.
__________________
Law and Order: Gotham - “In the Criminal Justice System of Gotham City the people are represented by three separate, yet equally important groups. The police who investigate crime, the District Attorneys who prosecute the offenders, and the Batman. These are their stories.”
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|