Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94
The new evidence is a method of testing that can tell that a non-Ramsey DNA source pulled down her pajamas. And if I'm remembering correctly, it matches the DNA of the drop of blood they had previously found.
So I guess what's different about how the Ramsey's were excluded before is that the "new" DNA not only exonerates them, but it points to a completely different, but unmatched murderer.
|
I still don't buy it. The new DNA matches the drop of blood from the previous DNA. If that is the case then would not the previous DNA have excluded the family? Wasn't there also a hair found on the body that didn't match the family?
Threaded Mode
