Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC
It clearly shows the deficit increased exponentially under Clinton, just as it did under Bush. That's my point - that you're twisting one "fact" to fit an argument that doesn't exist.
Now, by avoiding the topic entirely, you're clearly hiding from the light of reason - keep crawling under the rock though.
|
Tsk, tsk. How you twist things around. Don't you recall that you ended your argument with these words, "We could continue if you'd like, but I think this is more than enough." It wasn't "more than enough." In fact, you still never addressed the chart you posted which pointed out the exact opposite of the point you were attempting to make.
I'll continue the discussion with you, but a few ground rules?
- please stop with the Readers Digest "Expand Your Vocabulary" words. I'm not in the least bit impressed. I see people throwing around these "intellectual" words on message boards when they don't have the substance to back up their points.
- if you're going to make a statement as a "fact," please back it up with attribution. You screwed up royally with the chart you copied and pasted.
Threaded Mode
