Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
While we may disagree on whether taking him away from his work for questioning was wrong, that's a completely different issue from whether his First Amendment rights were violated.
Don't worry -- I know the slippery slope well.
I also know that sometimes there's more (or maybe less) to the story than what initially appears in the news or on a blog.
|
all these points are valid
although I disagree. I think that by taking him away from his work, just the timing of it, makes it seem like something was fishy about it. Like, if they acted as soon as he started, then I would agree that questioning him about wouldn't violate the first amendment, but the night before it opens when he was finishing work on it makes it seem to me (maybe not apparent to everyone, but I see it) as a [possible] attempt to keep the show from going, which would be censorship.
Threaded Mode
