» GC Stats |
Members: 329,905
Threads: 115,689
Posts: 2,207,178
|
Welcome to our newest member, aelizabethahvso |
|
 |
|

06-04-2008, 11:58 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,255
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jon1856
I am not arguing the point of who to vote for.
I was just commenting on the current state of the economy.
Over the past 8 years.
And I have very little problem with those making a great deal of money paying a fair share of taxes back. And some guy named Buffet seems to think like that as well.
|
We probably have different views on what is "fair." Also, though I respect Warren, I don't really care about his views on taxation.
|

06-04-2008, 12:40 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greater NorthEast
Posts: 3,185
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinerbock
We probably have different views on what is "fair." Also, though I respect Warren, I don't really care about his views on taxation.
|
Ok-fine.
I can not speak for you, but I know that I am no where near the top 1%.. 
Perhaps 10%
Last edited by jon1856; 06-04-2008 at 12:47 PM.
|

06-04-2008, 12:56 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jon1856
Ok-fine.
I can not speak for you, but I know that I am no where near the top 1%.. 
Perhaps 10% 
|
I don't know that someone's current wealth position always has a direct correlation to their feelings on tax policy. I'm certainly not top 1%, but I agree more with Shiner's position.
|

06-04-2008, 01:00 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greater NorthEast
Posts: 3,185
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSigkid
I don't know that someone's current wealth position always has a direct correlation to their feelings on tax policy. I'm certainly not top 1%, but I agree more with Shiner's position.
|
We perhaps should start a thread on tax and end this hi-jack.
|

06-04-2008, 01:02 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 1,822
|
|
Does anyone think that Obama HAS to choose Clinton now? She has said she will consider the spot... MEANING, if she doesn't get it after winning the popular vote... the Clinton-ites will go from livid to psycho  She forced Obama to give it to her now.
Personally, I really think Obama should choose Kathleen Sebelius. It will help him fill his weakness. She has been a vocal supporter of his. She is a strong woman who could hopefully attract the Clinton-ites... AND she is not scary!!!
|

06-04-2008, 01:15 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,255
|
|
Barack doesn't need a woman, he needs a white male. If I was running his campaign, I'd suggest Evan Bayh.
As for taxation, all Barack is telling me is that he won't make an unfair tax system more unfair to most. I'm not impressed. That is, if I'm to believe him.
|

06-04-2008, 01:37 PM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,564
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinerbock
Barack doesn't need a woman, he needs a white male. If I was running his campaign, I'd suggest Evan Bayh.
|
That's not a bad idea, except he might want to look for someone from a different region of the US. I guess Clinton & Gore effectively have disproved that being a must though.
When I hear some of the ideas for Republican Veep, I honestly want to hurl...it's pretty bad when you think "can't they just call Dan Quayle?"
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
|

06-04-2008, 01:28 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greater NorthEast
Posts: 3,185
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by a.e.B.O.T.
Does anyone think that Obama HAS to choose Clinton now? She has said she will consider the spot... MEANING, if she doesn't get it after winning the popular vote... the Clinton-ites will go from livid to psycho  She forced Obama to give it to her now.
Personally, I really think Obama should choose Kathleen Sebelius. It will help him fill his weakness. She has been a vocal supporter of his. She is a strong woman who could hopefully attract the Clinton-ites... AND she is not scary!!!
|
Has too-No.
On a list-perhaps yes.
Have heard Kathleen's name in other conversations. She should definitely be on The A List.
I think a few former Generals could/should be on list as well.
Last edited by jon1856; 06-04-2008 at 01:52 PM.
|

06-04-2008, 01:55 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Home.
Posts: 8,261
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by a.e.B.O.T.
Does anyone think that Obama HAS to choose Clinton now? She has said she will consider the spot... MEANING, if she doesn't get it after winning the popular vote... the Clinton-ites will go from livid to psycho  She forced Obama to give it to her now.
Personally, I really think Obama should choose Kathleen Sebelius. It will help him fill his weakness. She has been a vocal supporter of his. She is a strong woman who could hopefully attract the Clinton-ites... AND she is not scary!!!
|
See my earlier post. If he selects that shrill vindictive bitch, then he will be seen as weak and the Clinton era of lies, deceit, and liberal entitlement will continue.
Oh damn, maybe I should just go on and admit that I'm slowly becoming Republican.  Those damn taxes do it to me every time...
He needs a white male from the South, or maybe the Rust Belt.
|

06-04-2008, 02:11 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greater NorthEast
Posts: 3,185
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchkin03
See my earlier post. If he selects that shrill vindictive bitch, then he will be seen as weak and the Clinton era of lies, deceit, and liberal entitlement will continue.
Oh damn, maybe I should just go on and admit that I'm slowly becoming Republican.  Those damn taxes do it to me every time...
He needs a white male from the South, or maybe the Rust Belt.
|
Not that I love taxes however thought should be given to:
When ever a "disaster" occurs, our hands go out.
When ever there is a problem with the interstucture, our hands go out.
When ever we look for a service, our hands go out.
Most of us who use any kind of mass transit, our hands are going out.
And all that money comes from just where?
We, the people, have been told so often that taxes are evil that we some times may just forget what pays for things.
And what other things get substituted for them.
Including debt.
|

06-04-2008, 02:33 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,255
|
|
Obama could do everything he promises too, and I still wouldn't want him as President. He would probably do a very good job as a borderline socialist leader, but that isn't something that interests me.
|

06-04-2008, 02:35 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,255
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jon1856
Not that I love taxes however thought should be given to:
When ever a "disaster" occurs, our hands go out.
When ever there is a problem with the interstucture, our hands go out.
When ever we look for a service, our hands go out.
Most of us who use any kind of mass transit, our hands are going out.
And all that money comes from just where?
We, the people, have been told so often that taxes are evil that we some times may just forget what pays for things.
And what other things get substituted for them.
Including debt.
|
I would contest that the hands going out, not the distaste for high taxation, is the problem here.
|

06-11-2008, 08:34 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: on GreekChat, duh.
Posts: 679
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jon1856
Not that I love taxes however thought should be given to:
When ever a "disaster" occurs, our hands go out.
When ever there is a problem with the interstucture, our hands go out.
When ever we look for a service, our hands go out.
Most of us who use any kind of mass transit, our hands are going out.
And all that money comes from just where?
We, the people, have been told so often that taxes are evil that we some times may just forget what pays for things.
And what other things get substituted for them.
Including debt.
|
I couldn't agree more. There are some things that are worth our money... helping our neighbors after disasters, maintaining our infrastructure, maintaining a powerful military that answers our every beck and call... the line, "Freedom isn't free" comes to mind. While not everyone chooses to serve with his or her life, everyone serves our country by being a responsible citizen and paying taxes. Is is fun? No, but it is necessary. And in my opinion, it is a small price to pay to be able to enjoy the fruits of living in the best and most powerful nation in the world. Are there places where we can cut back? Absolutely. I'm very Christian, and as a result, I believe that it is in our nation's best interest to be good stewards of our fortune. That being said, I'm also led by the Christian precept of taking care of "the least of these." I'm all for open markets and capitalism-- to a point. When we become irresponsible and run over people, I draw the line.
__________________
|

06-04-2008, 04:00 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: location, location... isn't that what it's all about?
Posts: 4,207
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchkin03
He needs a white male from the South, or maybe the Rust Belt.
|
If he goes this route, he should pick Ted Strickland from Ohio. I'd prefer Bill Richardson, since he was my first choice in the primaries anyway. If he picks Richardson, I'll be able to get more excited about the ticket. He needs a governor, he needs to fill in that "executive office" experience gap and Richardson also brings foreign relations and cabinet experience. He also can reach out to the Hispanic vote, which Hillary did better with (though there also might be prejudice against him for the same reason). I like Evan Bayh, but (a) he won't help the "too liberal" argument and (b) teaming up a Senator from Indiana with a Senator from Illinois doesn't exactly make a power-duo ticket. Plus if he goes with the "I need a governor so I can't pick a Senator" argument, he gets out of the whole considering Hillary thing. I actually preferred Hillary over Obama, but I just don't see her in the #2 slot, I'd worry it'd lay the groundwork for a terribly dysfunctional administration.
|

06-04-2008, 04:31 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: a little here and a little there
Posts: 4,837
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nittanyalum
I actually preferred Hillary over Obama, but I just don't see her in the #2 slot, I'd worry it'd lay the groundwork for a terribly dysfunctional administration.
|
I totally agree. If Obama picks Hillary, I forsee a terrible power struggle.
I'm not an Obama supporter, but i was impressed with the speech he gave last night. I lol'ed at the commentators (or whatever they are called) when they were reviewing Obama's comment about McCain not addressing Obama's achievements.
Do you all thinks Edwards would be a better VP choice than Hillary?
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|