California's top court overturns gay marriage ban

[a.e.B.O.T.]

Originally Posted by nate2512

Well that's natural for those animals, the argument is that since animals sometimes eat their young, then if humans wanted to as well, that would be natural. It certainly is not, so you cannot compare animal husbandry to support your argument that its natural.

Since when is "it certainly is not" a good rebuttal? So, if you are going to say something, explain yourself, instead of JUST telling people what they can and can not compare this to that to. This is the defense of a six year old, and I am not being sarcastic, this is a way a child would rebuttal.

[TexasWSP]

Originally Posted by a.e.B.O.T.

Since when is "it certainly is not" a good rebuttal? So, if you are going to say something, explain yourself, instead of JUST telling people what they can and can not compare this to that to. This is the defense of a six year old, and I am not being sarcastic, this is a way a child would rebuttal.

Did you even read what he wrote? Humans eating their young is "certainly not" natural.

.......or do you disagree with that? Pretty sure he doesn't need to explain that concept.

[a.e.B.O.T.]

Originally Posted by TexasWSP

Did you even read what he wrote? Humans eating their young is "certainly not" natural.

.......or do you disagree with that? Pretty sure he doesn't need to explain that concept.

He was twisting logic, which EVERYONE seems to do in this thread as opposed to talk straight about the topic. As far as his twisted logic goes, I see his point, but I would never make that point...

[nate2512]

Originally Posted by a.e.B.O.T.

He was twisting logic, which EVERYONE seems to do in this thread as opposed to talk straight about the topic. As far as his twisted logic goes, I see his point, but I would never make that point...

How was that twisting logic? That was completely straight-forward logic as you are going to get in this thread.

[nate2512]

Originally Posted by a.e.B.O.T.

Since when is "it certainly is not" a good rebuttal? So, if you are going to say something, explain yourself, instead of JUST telling people what they can and can not compare this to that to. This is the defense of a six year old, and I am not being sarcastic, this is a way a child would rebuttal.

Since "it certainly is not" is tied together with an entire post and doesn't stand on its own.