|
Although I'm not a fan, I think this is reasonable. I do have a some concerns about this line of reasoning (not really race related), however.
The idea that "lapel-pin" patriotism is somehow less "robust" is concerning. Plenty of us are outwardly proud to be a part of this country, and yet are still willing to subject our nation to scrutiny. While I suspect Dyson probably intended that comment to refer narrowly to the "blind" support he mentions later, I think it is somewhat reflective of an elitist condescension concerning traditional displays of patriotism. It is one thing to think "These colors don't run!!!!" shirts at a NASCAR race are somewhat humorous, and another to cringe every time someone expresses a more affirmative expression of love for this country (one that isn't necessarily tinged with criticism). I hope this doesn't pertain to Dyson, but I know for certain in describes a significant portion of liberal academia.
Regarding Obama, I find his view of this country somewhat disconcerting. I certainly have no quarrel with his assertion about America's perfection. That said, his focus on "progress" is troubling for people who believe that "progressive" policies are anything but. I'm not necessarily saying this is unpatriotic, because I have little doubt that his desire for change results from his affection for America. But if your love for America is arguably contingent upon a vision of "progress" that many find dangerous, we may soon find a country of adverse patriots.
Sorry if this has gone too far off topic for the thread starter. I just had to bring in a couple of other things to really convey how I felt about this sentiment.
|
Threaded Mode
