U. of Wyoming: Temporary Suspension of Sigma Nu Chapter (Alleged Alcohol Violations)

[jon1856]

Originally Posted by Kevin

I'm quite certain that these guys know they did a bad thing and have taken internal steps to rectify the situation. An online confession or discussion about the particulars of whatever went on doesn't help anyone. Such a discussion may even cause the chapter more harm or breach the agreement they made with the school.

It looks like this thing was handled through the house corporation, the national fraternity and the school. If they're all happy with things, so am I.

Kevin; I would agree with you.
However judging solely on posting from someone claiming to be a Brother there, does not seem to me that there is an understanding.

And the point of my posting was not to cause a discussion per se on the particulars of the event but to get away from the grade school level of snitching.

From my experiences covering things up, as has been suggested here, as if they never happened generally only makes things worse at so many levels.

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by jon1856

Kevin; I would agree with you.
However judging solely on posting from someone claiming to be a Brother there, does not seem to me that there is an understanding.

And the point of my posting was not to cause a discussion per se on the particulars of the event but to get away from the grade school level of snitching.

From my experiences covering things up, as has been suggested here, as if they never happened generally only makes things worse at so many levels.

Jon, I'll take credit for that. I advised him not to say anything which wouldn't help his chapter's situation. He's not his chapter's spokesman, so really, we have no business interrogating him over this thing.

That he may or may not be upset that his chapter got turned in for what may or may not have been a minor violation is really immaterial. The story here is that they were reported by another fraternity and the problem has been solved by the active chapter signing, the university and the house corporation [alumni] signing an agreement which seems to set milestones for reinstatement.

As far as I'm concerned, there's not a lot else to the story other than the snitching issue, which can be an interesting discussion.

[jon1856]

Originally Posted by Kevin

Jon, I'll take credit for that. I advised him not to say anything which wouldn't help his chapter's situation. He's not his chapter's spokesman, so really, we have no business interrogating him over this thing.

That he may or may not be upset that his chapter got turned in for what may or may not have been a minor violation is really immaterial. The story here is that they were reported by another fraternity and the problem has been solved by the active chapter signing, the university and the house corporation [alumni] signing an agreement which seems to set milestones for reinstatement.

As far as I'm concerned, there's not a lot else to the story other than the snitching issue, which can be an interesting discussion.

"Snitching issue"?
Def:
1. intransitive verb inform on somebody: to tell somebody in authority about another person's wrongdoing
IMVHO, this is a R/M issue along with an issue of what do Greeks, as both a chapter and a group, stand for. And how we behave and police our actions.
Both, as pointed out, would have a great deal impact on relationships
with school and community.
We have seen here, and I have seen personally, just how badly self-policing can go. Too many college kids think that self-policing is taking care of one incident at a time on their own and without any help. And forgetting about it when it happens again. And it is only when matters get really out of control, that the "authorities" step in. And then of course everyone gets bent out of shape on that.
And we have all seen just what happens when the media get hold of a Greek incident.

And just as there are no perfect cut and dry definitions of hazing, we could get into a long discussion on who tells what to whom at what point and when is it correct. And why and why. Which IMVHO would turn in a train wreak.

[banditone]

The problem that I have seen many times is when the "snitching" GLO is only doing so against a house that is above them in the tier system (it exists, I didn't create it, so don't blame me) in the hopes of knocking them down some, and in some way bringing their own group up some in the aftermath.


-- holy run-on sentences batman...

[jon1856]

[quote=banditone;1605272]The problem that I have seen many times is when the "snitching" GLO is only doing so against a house that is above them in the tier system (it exists, I didn't create it, so don't blame me) in the hopes of knocking them down some, and in some way bringing their own group up some in the aftermath.

quote]
Seen this many times???? Hummm
And just what kinds of "reports" are being made?
Reports are one matter, the out come of the investigation is another.

I know someone almost died because someone thought it would be "funny" to spike some punch at a party. He happens to be allergic to alcohol.

Or how about date rape? Does that reported?
Would reporting either one be considered knocking a house down or following code of conduct, morality, and ethics et al ???

Both happened, one at a campus, one later one. And I asked the question rhetorically.

Just goes back to my comments in prior posting.

[banditone]

"I saw beer at so and so house".

that type of report. no, i'm not talking about rapes or hazing liquor fests.

[jon1856]

Originally Posted by banditone

"I saw beer at so and so house".

that type of report. no, I'm not talking about rapes or hazing liquor fests.

You neglected to add to your posting what happened next. Were there any investigations or just a report filed away?
And that liquor spiking was not part of hazing; was at a party.
Hazing is another issue.