GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 333,951
Threads: 115,763
Posts: 2,209,127
Welcome to our newest member, Timothysug
» Online Users: 4,448
0 members and 4,448 guests
No Members online
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 02-09-2008, 08:27 PM
UGAalum94 UGAalum94 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,382
At this point, I'm kind of over it as I'm sure many of you are as well. Everyone who has posted is in agreement that Bush wasn't a particularly good President; we just vary in the degree for which we'd blame him on different issues.

I think it's really important not to let congress off the hook. I'll offer the reminder that Kyoto was signed in a largely symbolic gesture after the Senate refused (in advance) to ratify it during the during the Clinton Presidency. It was never even submitted by the Clinton Administration for ratification. We can say the Clinton Administration had a better attitude about global warming, but we can't really say they got much done, and in this case it was the Senate with the block.

Yes, I did pay attention when the expansion of the children's heath care program was shot down. And to tell you the truth, I support it being shot down. I'm all about health care for children but I think federal programs are the least effective way to guarantee that it's delivered well. Every nice thing that we think we need isn't best addressed by a federal program, IMO, so as heartless as it might seem, in this particular instance, I think Bush acted correctly. If states need to raise taxes to offer expanded children's health services, then they need to bite the bullet and do it themselves. Perhaps they could tax the CEOs.

Although I'm not particularly pro-CEO taxcut, I again tend to think that congress bears a lot of responsibility for the issues of taxing and spending.

If you all want, we can review this issues four years from now and see if we all feel the same way when there's been someone we generally like more than Bush in office for four years. Let's mark our calendars for 2012.

Last edited by UGAalum94; 02-09-2008 at 08:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gov. BIll Richardson Prepares to Announce 2008 Presidential Bid jon1856 News & Politics 1 01-21-2007 09:22 PM
Convention 2008 GtownGirl98 Alpha Gamma Delta 10 08-08-2006 03:02 PM
2008 Nominations TheGeneral Delta Sigma Theta 9 02-11-2006 12:08 AM
2008 Presidential Race KillarneyRose News & Politics 57 01-30-2006 04:07 PM
Who would you vote for in 2008? cashmoney News & Politics 5 04-01-2005 04:14 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.