GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 332,016
Threads: 115,728
Posts: 2,208,070
Welcome to our newest member, zabryantpo1292
» Online Users: 3,576
1 members and 3,575 guests
Xidelt
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-06-2008, 01:47 PM
LeslieAGD LeslieAGD is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,867
Send a message via AIM to LeslieAGD
Honestly, I hate all these friggin' websites! Every single one has different numbers concerning the delegates.
__________________
AGD
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-06-2008, 02:19 PM
KSig RC KSig RC is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Who you calling "boy"? The name's Hand Banana . . .
Posts: 6,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeslieAGD View Post
Honestly, I hate all these friggin' websites! Every single one has different numbers concerning the delegates.
This is because they're estimating differently; vote tallies aren't final, and "superdelegates" aren't finalized at all, although some have intimated they will follow the popular vote, some have ties to Clinton/Obama, and some are likely to follow brokered deals at the DNC if Obama pulls off the remaining states (which are mostly Midwestern or have a large black population) and keeps things effectively deadlocked. Clinton has a large edge in superdelegates right now, but that could rapidly change.

I wouldn't worry about actual delegate counts at all, actually - they'll be fluid until the DNC, plus Michigan and Florida delegates are going to try to be seated (and no one knows what the hell will happen there), plus superdelegates have no structure to their votes. Absolutely no one will know or agree.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-06-2008, 02:23 PM
skylark skylark is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 651
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC View Post
This is because they're estimating differently; vote tallies aren't final, and "superdelegates" aren't finalized at all, although some have intimated they will follow the popular vote, some have ties to Clinton/Obama, and some are likely to follow brokered deals at the DNC if Obama pulls off the remaining states (which are mostly Midwestern or have a large black population) and keeps things effectively deadlocked. Clinton has a large edge in superdelegates right now, but that could rapidly change.
jinx, you owe me a coke :-)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-06-2008, 02:27 PM
nittanyalum nittanyalum is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: location, location... isn't that what it's all about?
Posts: 4,207
Quote:
Originally Posted by skylark View Post
jinx, you owe me a coke :-)
I love that ad with Carville and Frist.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-06-2008, 03:00 PM
KSig RC KSig RC is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Who you calling "boy"? The name's Hand Banana . . .
Posts: 6,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by skylark at 6:21 View Post
jinx, you owe me a coke :-)
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC at 06:19
I am awesome
Looks like I beat you there by a few minutes - this means you owe me the Coke, shooter. Hey, I don't make the rules.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-07-2008, 02:57 PM
sunnyhibiscus sunnyhibiscus is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 230
I have a question, do you think that if Obama loses Texas and win the majority of the remaining states. do you think that he'll get the nomination?

I doubt that Obama will win Texas, because he's having trouble with the Latino votes. And of course, Texas has a lot of Latino voters.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-07-2008, 03:17 PM
33girl 33girl is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,574
Romney just quit.

"If I fight on in my campaign, all the way to the convention, I would forestall the launch of a national campaign and make it more likely that Senator Clinton or Obama would win. And in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign, be a part of aiding a surrender to terror," Romney told the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington.

I'm sorry, but what a dweeb.
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-07-2008, 03:29 PM
Tom Earp Tom Earp is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Kansas City, Kansas USA
Posts: 23,586
Well, the field is really narrowing down on both sides.

The field still sucks!
__________________
LCA


LX Z # 1
Alumni
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-07-2008, 04:59 PM
jon1856 jon1856 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greater NorthEast
Posts: 3,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by 33girl View Post
Romney just quit.

"If I fight on in my campaign, all the way to the convention, I would forestall the launch of a national campaign and make it more likely that Senator Clinton or Obama would win. And in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign, be a part of aiding a surrender to terror," Romney told the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington.

I'm sorry, but what a dweeb.
I thought very much the same as I heard his speech.
I do not believe that anyone, at this time, would not and does not support the war on terrorism.

All he did was pick up on one of Bush's favorite comments.

Seems as if the party's gloves are now off. This is just the start of the mud slinging I fear.

On another note; the WSJ suggested a non-partisan web site to follow matters; including delegate counts.
It is:
http://realclearpolitics.com/
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-08-2008, 02:26 PM
Tom Earp Tom Earp is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Kansas City, Kansas USA
Posts: 23,586
With Mitt, it made me wonder to much about the money out of pocket to attain this position and scared the heck out of me.

He looks good and is very presentable but, there is/was a big but in my mind and evidently others as well.

Stiil on the list:

Demos:Hill and O

Repubs: Mac and Huck.

God where are we going to end up after this election finally gets over.

I also noticed in the posters link how the polls came out for both Bush and the legislature. Doesn't look good at any end of the spectrum.
__________________
LCA


LX Z # 1
Alumni
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-07-2008, 03:38 PM
skylark skylark is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 651
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunnyhibiscus View Post
I doubt that Obama will win Texas, because he's having trouble with the Latino votes. And of course, Texas has a lot of Latino voters.
I don't know though... Obama has done really well in states that are traditionally very conservative, even with Latinos in those states. From what I can tell it is the blue-state-Latinos he has trouble with. With republican and independent Latinos, he does better. I paid attention in particular when Obama won a county in Idaho that is particularly known for having a high Latino population. He ended up winning that county by 76%.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-06-2008, 02:21 PM
skylark skylark is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 651
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeslieAGD View Post
Honestly, I hate all these friggin' websites! Every single one has different numbers concerning the delegates.
Some of the changing might be because not all states have everything counted (which is the case in Calif.) so estimates of the final delegate count vary for a certain amount of time, I guess.

Another discrepancy I've seen is that some websites are counting the "superdelegates" as if they had already been pledged to a certain candidate, which isn't the case at all. The superdelegates can go however they want to come the national convention. If you take out the superdelegates, the most recent delegate counts have Barack ahead of Hillary.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gov. BIll Richardson Prepares to Announce 2008 Presidential Bid jon1856 News & Politics 1 01-21-2007 09:22 PM
Convention 2008 GtownGirl98 Alpha Gamma Delta 10 08-08-2006 03:02 PM
2008 Nominations TheGeneral Delta Sigma Theta 9 02-11-2006 12:08 AM
2008 Presidential Race KillarneyRose News & Politics 57 01-30-2006 04:07 PM
Who would you vote for in 2008? cashmoney News & Politics 5 04-01-2005 04:14 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.