GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 332,020
Threads: 115,729
Posts: 2,208,076
Welcome to our newest member, aellacahsz6740
» Online Users: 2,098
0 members and 2,098 guests
No Members online
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-11-2008, 10:35 AM
33girl 33girl is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Low C Sharp View Post
police power of the state. Just like the smoking ban.
wow, sieg heil.

As far as Dana Reeve some articles blamed her getting lung cancer on working in nightclubs when she was younger. But if a smoker's lung cancer risk decreases this much when he quits, wouldn't it be even quicker for a nonsmoker who left a smoky environment?

I believe the IMMENSE FREAKING STRESS she was under caring for her husband for all those years is more likely what caused/aggravated the cancer, plus some people's bodies are just more susceptible. Same with Andy Kaufman (although his stress was probably more self-inflicted).
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-11-2008, 12:57 PM
KSig RC KSig RC is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Who you calling "boy"? The name's Hand Banana . . .
Posts: 6,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by 33girl View Post
But if a smoker's lung cancer risk decreases this much when he quits, wouldn't it be even quicker for a nonsmoker who left a smoky environment?
I'm not sure those statistics are accurate - I mean, it's a sales web site, and there's no citation whatsoever . . . the SG warning that said "Quitting Smoking Now Greatly Reduces Serious Risks to Your Health" wasn't because the risk of lung cancer would actually go down, IIRC, it was more because it wouldn't continue to increase (as it would continuously if the individual continued to smoke).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-11-2008, 01:10 PM
33girl 33girl is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC View Post
I'm not sure those statistics are accurate - I mean, it's a sales web site, and there's no citation whatsoever . . . the SG warning that said "Quitting Smoking Now Greatly Reduces Serious Risks to Your Health" wasn't because the risk of lung cancer would actually go down, IIRC, it was more because it wouldn't continue to increase (as it would continuously if the individual continued to smoke).
I've seen those statistics before, on non-sales sites, that just happened to be the first place I found a link.

This thread is starting to remind me of the OMG LEAD IN LIPSTICK email that circulates once a year or so.
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Smoking Still? preciousjeni Chit Chat 62 12-29-2008 06:51 PM
Smoking Aces AKA2D '91 Alpha Kappa Alpha 6 01-29-2007 10:19 PM
thanks for smoking FSUZeta Entertainment 18 04-28-2006 02:12 PM
smoking? JMUduke Chit Chat 29 07-14-2002 08:24 PM
smoking CRMSNTiDEGRL717 Greek Life 24 04-12-2001 12:58 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.