In this thread we mourn GC'ers long gone away

[jon1856]

Originally Posted by KSig RC

Tom -

Please stop with the insults, they violate the TOS.

Besides this, they add nothing productive to the conversation - if you have a theory on why people have left, you should make these clear instead of making thinly-veiled insinuations.

Better yet, start a new thread for such a discussion.

Thanks.
RC

Tom may have been referring to the on going conflicts on GC.
As well as the "power struggles" for lack of a better term.

Of which too many of us, myself include, became involved with or within.

The changes that John instituted seem to have been of great help in
making this board a bit more civil.

[SHEETCAKE]

Originally Posted by jon1856

Tom may have been referring to the on going conflicts on GC.
As well as the "power struggles" for lack of a better term.

Of which too many of us, myself include, became involved with or within.

The changes that John instituted seem to have been of great help in
making this board a bit more civil.

Way to check the date, chronic-link-posting
carriage-return man!

[PeppyGPhiB]

Why do you think Gamma Phi shot itself in the foot by not offering her a bid? I don't think our chapter at UCSC has fallen apart since then. They can't offer a bid to EVERY girl that wants in. I'm sure other women on this board believe in their own org's right to selective membership, too.

In fact, her rejection from Gamma Phi might have been responsible for Kappa Kappa Gamma now being on that campus. After all, I don't think Gamma Phi liked being the only NPC on campus, and since there apparently was more demand from women than what one sorority could acommodate, the school opened itself up to a second NPC.

[jon1856]

Originally Posted by SHEETCAKE

Way to check the date, chronic-link-posting
carriage-return man!

The whole thread is active; so why this post?
And given the round of current postings, perhaps I spoke too early.
Or too late.
And perhaps one needs to review the GC TOS page as well.