Quote:
Originally Posted by SECdomination
Progress for the sake of progress is an unfortunate idea.
I don't know what our clause says, but we have no gays in our chapter: and we're doing just fine.
|
I know of no HQ or IHQ that is saying that you have to take gay members. The nondiscriminatory clauses just mean that ideally, being gay should not be a factor for or against a member or PNM. That being said, there are chapters that would hold it against someone and some that will not.
And, go right ahead believing that there are no gay members in your chapter. There are. They aren't out publicly because either they aren't ready to be out, or they think that they just "Haven't met the right girl yet", or they know that many members of your chapter will not be accepting. You may even have a member or two who are out privately to a couple of the other members that they trust. It happens.
ETA: Sorry, the bold emphasis would not turn off. I tried. I really tried.
__________________
Sigma Chi. Friendship, Justice, and Learning since 1855.
I'll support the RedWolves, but in my heart I'll always be an ASU Indian. Go Tribe! (1931-2008)
|
Threaded Mode
