Quote:
Originally Posted by ARTISTKNOWNASBE
NO THAT MUST BE WHAT YOU ARE ASSUMING. CAUSE I NEVER SAID THAT. MAYBE YOU SHOULD READ WHAT I SAID. THEN GET BACK WITH ME...
THE REASON WHY PROMISCOUS BLACK WOMEN ARE REFERRED TO (BY SOME PEOPLE) AS WHORES IS BECAUSE OF INDOCTRINATION, IGNORANCE, AND UNAWARENESS OF SELF. I DON'T HAVE TIME TO GO OVER THAT WITH YOU...
|
brothaman. ima need you to back up 10 feet.
i took what YOU said: "Because they are white and rich not black and poor" and YOUR logic: "In my opinion, calling a promiscous black women, "Whore" but not calling rich white promiscous women the same is a DOUBLE STANDARD."
though you left it out from that second statement, if "rich white" women ARENT called whores, (but rather, promiscous, deflecting some but not all negative connotation), but black women ARE whores (labelling them with completely negative connotation), then you're taking the direct OPPOSITE to make your (incomplete) correlation.
in standardized test version:
rich, white : promiscous::_______, black:whores
that's the analogy you made, but with what you've written in your previous posts, that's how it read to me and you (mistakenly or not, subconsciously or not) there's an element of black women being painted as whores not only because of their skin but because of their class. and we ALL know, like i said, that a whore is a whore is a whore. rich, poor, white, black, whatever.
i'm SURE you didn't mean to paint it as such and at the end of the day we're just spitting rhetoric. that's cool, but again ima need you breathe and stop. and ease up on them caps.
thanks for understanding and welcome to GC.