» GC Stats |
Members: 329,743
Threads: 115,668
Posts: 2,205,121
|
Welcome to our newest member, loganttso2709 |
|
 |

04-13-2007, 11:07 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,255
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little32
Question #1: Who are these leaders that your refer to? The people that we see on tv every time there is a need for a soundbite from a black face, or the activists, scholars, preachers, and less well-known community leaders that have been speaking about these issues for years?
Questions #2: Are we to be held responsible for or even to take into consideration people's "disbelief"? Or are those disbelieving folk to be held responsible for not educating themselves, as to how this issue has been and continues to be addressed by leaders on multiple levels in black communities, before proclaiming that nothing has been done?
I think TonyB's comments are right on target. As, of course, this is an issue of the denigration of Black Womanhood, I too am interested to see what happens when the hype about the white man at the center of this discussion fades.
|
#1, I mean the people in the mainstream. Not the community leaders with limited following. Lets be honest, a lot of you guys on here are among the upper echelon in your communities. Well educated, well off, etc, same as the white people on here. You're much more likely to be in touch with the more subdued, responsible leaders within the black community. However, what I'm talking about are the leaders, like Sharpton and Jackson, who can mobilize large numbers quickly and act as the self-elected representatives of the black community.
#2, When it comes to disbelief, its either accept what people like you assert (those who think there isn't any double standard), or accept what they have seen over the years. Is it really mainstream if people have to "educate" themselves to find out about it?
|

04-13-2007, 11:46 AM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,519
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinerbock
self-elected representatives of the black community.
|
Michael Jackson is the self-elected "King of Pop Music." So answer me 2 things:
-When's the last time you listened to pop (that is, popular, mainstream) music?
-When's the last time you listened to anything new by Michael Jackson?
I rest my case.
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
|

04-13-2007, 11:49 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,255
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 33girl
Michael Jackson is the self-elected "King of Pop Music." So answer me 2 things:
-When's the last time you listened to pop (that is, popular, mainstream) music?
-When's the last time you listened to anything new by Michael Jackson?
I rest my case.
|
If you rest your case, then you lose on the merits. Completely irrelevant.
|

04-13-2007, 12:04 PM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,519
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinerbock
If you rest your case, then you lose on the merits. Completely irrelevant.
|
You are just completely missing the point that just because Al Sharpton does this or that, doesn't mean 98% of the Black community (or the earth in general) gives a crap because he and/or the media have deemed him a "spokesman."
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
|

04-13-2007, 12:43 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,255
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 33girl
You are just completely missing the point that just because Al Sharpton does this or that, doesn't mean 98% of the Black community (or the earth in general) gives a crap because he and/or the media have deemed him a "spokesman."
|
Uh, thats not even a point that needs making. I've said numerous times through this whole ordeal that I realize Sharpton and Co. don't represent all black people. However, he does mobilize them with ease, and he is a mainstream leader. I agree that the media aids him, but I simply think it would be false to say Sharpton and Jackson aren't extremely influential leaders within the black community.
|

04-13-2007, 12:54 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Orlando..unfortunately....
Posts: 1,014
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinerbock
Uh, thats not even a point that needs making. I've said numerous times through this whole ordeal that I realize Sharpton and Co. don't represent all black people. However, he does mobilize them with ease, and he is a mainstream leader. I agree that the media aids him, but I simply think it would be false to say Sharpton and Jackson aren't extremely influential leaders within the black community.
|
I have no clue who these folks are that Sharpton "mobilized".  The majority of African Americans that I know would actually prefer if Sharpton and Jackson stepped back sometimes instead of constantly leading the world to believe that they are "champions of all causes related to Black people".
As been mentioned, various individuals and groups have been vocal and outspoken about the language and images in rap music. But news channels don't care about that fight, they simply call up the two Black people they have on speed-dial, Sharpton and Jackson.
ETA: I don't know how "influential" they are either...
|

04-13-2007, 01:04 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,255
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jubilance1922
I have no clue who these folks are that Sharpton "mobilized".  The majority of African Americans that I know would actually prefer if Sharpton and Jackson stepped back sometimes instead of constantly leading the world to believe that they are "champions of all causes related to Black people".
As been mentioned, various individuals and groups have been vocal and outspoken about the language and images in rap music. But news channels don't care about that fight, they simply call up the two Black people they have on speed-dial, Sharpton and Jackson.
ETA: I don't know how "influential" they are either...
|
By mobilize, I mean at the snap of his fingers he can get a lot of black people supporting his side. Its been shown time and time again.
Honestly, do you really think there is a substantial portion of the black population willing to take a stand against rap music? If so, where is it? Frankly, I don't think there should be a stand against it, but this is a double standard discussion. I think people should be able to say what they want for the most part. I think the natural repercussions are generally sufficient.
|

04-13-2007, 01:15 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: in grown up land
Posts: 1,165
|
|
the fact of the matter remains that there HAS BEEN outrage, see TonyB's post above.
Earlier this week on the Today Show, Meridith V. barely gave Dr. Tatum an opportunity to cite the times our community (and Spelman women in particluar) have stood up to bring attention to this problem, and try to find solutions.
Just because mainstream media has overlooked it, doesn't mean the Black Community hasn't made efforts to counter negative messages in "hip hop."
__________________
Ratchet begins at home.
|

04-13-2007, 01:32 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Shooot...do you know? I didn't think so!
Posts: 1,623
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Still BLUTANG
Just because mainstream media has overlooked it, doesn't mean the Black Community hasn't made efforts to counter negative messages in "hip hop."
|
That's it right there! I have always heard about the plight of removing the screwed images and language in hip-hop about blacks period.
__________________
DSQ Sorority, Inc.
#4 - The Professor
Spring 2001 - GenuOne
Xi - University of Louisville
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|