GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 331,981
Threads: 115,727
Posts: 2,208,043
Welcome to our newest member, victoriaunior81
» Online Users: 3,118
1 members and 3,117 guests
Sberemege
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 04-10-2007, 07:41 PM
UGAalum94 UGAalum94 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,382
Let me try to explain this point:


"Would you set up a system that prevented administrators from telling teachers how to resolve the issues that parents had complained about?"

I agree that it was pretty unclear. Every once and a while, my state will try to pass a law allowing teachers to do something as basic as refuse to change a grade at the direction of the administration, but oftentimes, by the time the law is actually passed, it keeps the original language, but allows administrators just to go in and changed the grade themselves. This seems terrible to me. On some level teachers need protection from being undermined by administrators. (It happens with discipline too. Although there may be guidelines about how teachers handle issues, administrators often kick the issues back to the teachers to address. Or if the parent complains, the administrators will elect to tell the teacher just to let it go completely.)

Viewed from another angle though, isn't it the natural order of organizations that those higher up can review and change the decisions of people lower than they are? So restrictions about what administrators can do are contrary to most understandings of management.

But unlike the private sector where those higher up still remain accountable for the success of projects or work, success in education isn't as easy to define. (A teacher might say academic quality is success; a parent might say
a passage grade, earned or not, is success.)

And in a way particular, it seems to me to education, the damage that bad administrative decisions create is rarely visited back on the administrator in any way. Teachers and students have to live with the results. Administrators, although they may have more people to account to informally, are probably held even less accountable for student results than teachers are.

On some level, and I think it often comes with unions, teachers need a way to say no to bad decisions and directions if they ultimately will be "accountable" for the students learning. And yet, unions do as much to hinder educational improvement as any force in the equation.

Last edited by UGAalum94; 04-10-2007 at 07:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should the system of Quota be changed? A look at the Nebraska system BigRedBeta Recruitment 43 08-01-2006 12:24 PM
School teachers! (student teachers too!) AOII_LB93 Careers & Employment 8 09-08-2005 10:20 PM
Quarter System vs. Semester System MSKKG Academics 16 07-26-2005 09:47 PM
One for the teachers.. NinjaPoodle Chit Chat 0 10-14-2002 03:16 PM
teachers RHOyal-Silence Sigma Gamma Rho 14 09-26-2000 09:12 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.