Tri-Sigma Sorority

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by 33girl

Apparently many members are not able to make the distinction between a historical, sentimental and/or official connection.

Do you honestly think that the people who wrote that book (who are probably better versed in NPC rules and regs than 99% of those posting on this board) would have willfully done something which they knew to be a violation? Or how about the organization's national officers who read and likely had to give some sort of approval (I know nothing about how AXiD works internally) for the literature?

I would have to say that countless AXiDs who are well aware of the rules have looked over this literature, read it, understood it, etc., and yet there is no movement within that organization (an assumption I make evidenced by the recent issue of The Quill) to remove mentions of the historical "brother" relationship that they recognize with Sigma Nu. Surely there would at least on some level be a discussion if anyone in that organization had a problem with the way this relationship has been treated.

What you and PM_Mama are suggesting really does seem to be an amazing stretch. Especially when you make that statement without a shred of even anecdotal evidence.

[33girl]

Well, we have 2 AXiDs saying different things - one says that the material from HQ says Sigma Nu's NOT their brother fraternity, and one says that the material says they ARE.

Apparently there is a disconnect somewhere. Both posters are undergrads, so even if the manual was updated in the last year, I wouldn't think something like this would have changed that much in that space of time.

I'm just going by what the sisters themselves are saying.

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by 33girl

Well, we have 2 AXiDs saying different things - one says that the material from HQ says Sigma Nu's NOT their brother fraternity, and one says that the material says they ARE.

Apparently there is a disconnect somewhere. Both posters are undergrads, so even if the manual was updated in the last year, I wouldn't think something like this would have changed that much in that space of time.

I'm just going by what the sisters themselves are saying.

If y'all are so certain this is a violation, please explain to me how as much has escaped the ladies in charge of writing AXiD materials and approving them?

[AXIDplace4me]

Both of us have been supporting the idea of Sigma Nu being our brother fraternity. The reason why i said that they "aren't" is because it isn't in the constitution, but we like to think of them as our "brother fraternity" any way.

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by AXIDplace4me

Both of us have been supporting the idea of Sigma Nu being our brother fraternity. The reason why i said that they "aren't" is because it isn't in the constitution, but we like to think of them as our "brother fraternity" any way.

The relationship is sentimental, not official. I don't think anyone has ever represented it in any other way.

[NutBrnHair]

Originally Posted by Kevin

Do you honestly think that the people who wrote that book (who are probably better versed in NPC rules and regs than 99% of those posting on this board) would have willfully done something which they knew to be a violation? Or how about the organization's national officers who read and likely had to give some sort of approval (I know nothing about how AXiD works internally) for the literature?

Kevin, I agree.

I don't know what NPC "rule" is being referenced. The only agreement I know of is the one discouraging auxilliary groups. Even in that case -- NPC has no power of enforcement.

These are historical connections. There's nothing wrong with that.