An open letter to Bobby Earl

[litAKAtor]

Originally Posted by KAPital PHINUst

I told you about telling people about our facesitting sessions. Keep that to yourself, willya.

. .and NOT as if my LS can't respond on her own, but I feel compelled to defend her. That was TOTALLY inappropriate, particularly coming from a man of color to a woman of color.

[KAPital PHINUst]

Originally Posted by litAKAtor

. .and NOT as if my LS can't respond on her own, but I feel compelled to defend her. That was TOTALLY inappropriate, particularly coming from a man of color to a woman of color.

The fact that perhaps I have ODed on Kazo notwithstanding:

1. Perhaps Skee will think twice before calling me an "@$$face" (the basis for the joke, btw).
2. So was her remark(s) toward me in the past; so don't call me on the carpet for my remark(s) if you're not willing to call her on the carpet for hers, 'cause I ain't hearin' it, ya' heard?
3. If Skee can't take it, she shouldn't dish it!

*And I K.I.M.*

[litAKAtor]

Originally Posted by KAPital PHINUst

1. Perhaps Skee will think twice before calling me an "@$$face" (the basis for the joke, btw).

So we are at a stage in growth where we do tit for tat? . . .

2. So was her remark(s) toward me in the past; so don't call me on the carpet for my remark(s) if you're not willing to call her on the carpet for hers, 'cause I ain't hearin' it, ya' heard?

I am not a proponent of name calling period. Notwithstanding, I am dealing with present. Her comment, in my interpretation, was in response to your apparent badgering via pm (my interpretation of her message). I am not condoning her name calling, but the connotations of the two are distinctly different. Your retort was a degrading and in my opinion inappropriate reference to erotic activities in which she allegedly engages with you. Moreover, my allegiance is to my LS . . .and even if she wasn't, the comment was still, in my opinion, and inappropriate comment made to a sister by a brother . . .

3. If Skee can't take it, she shouldn't dish it!

Please refer to my first comment.

Skee ya!

[KAPital PHINUst]

Originally Posted by litAKAtor

So we are at a stage in growth where we do tit for tat? . . .

Not tit for tat, but reaping and sowing.

I am not a proponent of name calling period. Notwithstanding, I am dealing with present. Her comment, in my interpretation, was in response to your apparent badgering via pm (my interpretation of her message). I am not condoning her name calling, but the connotations of the two are distinctly different. Your retort was a degrading and in my opinion inappropriate reference to erotic activities in which she allegedly engages with you. Moreover, my allegiance is to my LS . . .and even if she wasn't, the comment was still, in my opinion, and inappropriate comment made to a sister by a brother . . .

Get the freak outta here with that double standards bulljive, I made a very genuine and friendly PM to her, and she decides to publicly get greasy with me to amp up the crowd for brownie points. Thus, she deserved exactly what she got, and if she does it again, she get it all the worse. Period, the end. I'on give a freak who's her LS.

Kudos to you for defening your LS, but sometimes when someone decides to knowingly get outta pocket with someone, they gotta take their lumps like an adult and on their own. But don't play the moral card with me when your own LS is no more in the right and expect it to be well received, 'CAUSE IT WON'T!!

Skee ya!

Yo-Skee (no pun intended *lol*), Diamonds and Pearls Forever (and all that other good stuff).