» GC Stats |
Members: 329,895
Threads: 115,688
Posts: 2,207,096
|
Welcome to our newest member, WalterGlymn |
|
 |

12-09-2006, 04:37 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 16,163
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrettyBoy
You're right, and I can't argue with on that. Those are great points you made, and a great team is very important for a driver to win races. No Jeff wouldn't be "THE" Jeff Gordon without a great crew, but I think his team wouldn't be good without him either. If the team is really good, and the crew chief always puts great cars on the track for the driver, but the driver sucks, then that team doesn't really serve a purpose. I'll use Jeremy Mayfield as an example. He made the chase the 1st year and 2nd year, but he still sucks as a driver. Evernham Motorsports is strong and rich, but Mayfield who sucks doesn't do his team any justice. If it wasn't for Jeff, Hendrick would be just above average. They would be good, but not as well known as they are with JG.
JJ pulled a great move at Las Vegas by only leading one lap to barely pass Matt Kenseth at the beginning of the season.
Jeff Gordon pulled a great move at Daytona in 1997 and passed Dale Earnhardt, and he won. I have that race on DVD. It was a bold move, but it worked. Earnhardt's car flipped 7 times I think, because of the move. I think it was kind of wrong on JG's part but it was still an exciting move and won him the Daytona 500 making him the youngest driver to win the Daytona 500. I know that was 10 years ago for Jeff, but why would he need to make dangerous or exciting moves to win now? He has 4 championships, he doesn't really need another one. I don't think he will be as daring as he once was. There really isn't a need for that now.
Tony got hurt at the beginning of the season, and Ricky Rudd drove a couple of races for him. If this didn't happen, do you think Tony would have won a consecutive championship. I think he would have. He was winning races in the chase even though he didn't make the chase this year. I think Johnson would have finished 2nd again.
|
This thread isn't about NASCAR!
|

12-09-2006, 05:03 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 6,744
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheerfulgreek
This thread isn't about NASCAR!
|
I know. This thread is about something so stupid we found something else to talk about.
Oh, by the way, did you find a black guy to screw yet?
__________________
The world system is in direct opposition to God and His Word — PrettyBoy The R35 GT-R doesn’t ask for permission. It takes control, rewrites the rules, and proves that AWD means All-Wheel Dominance — PrettyBoy
|

12-09-2006, 05:11 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 16,163
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrettyBoy
I know. This thread is about something so stupid we found something else to talk about.
Oh, by the way, did you find a black guy to screw yet? 
|
If it's so stupid why did you respond to it, and to answer your question, I wasn't looking asshole!
|

12-09-2006, 05:25 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 6,744
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheerfulgreek
If it's so stupid why did you respond to it, and to answer your question, I wasn't looking asshole!
|
Ohhh. LOL. You use such harsh words...
__________________
The world system is in direct opposition to God and His Word — PrettyBoy The R35 GT-R doesn’t ask for permission. It takes control, rewrites the rules, and proves that AWD means All-Wheel Dominance — PrettyBoy
|

12-09-2006, 08:29 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Ozdust Ballroom
Posts: 14,837
|
|
This thread makes the pics of Britney with Paris on her birthday look classy.
__________________
Facile remedium est ubertati; sterilia nullo labore vincuntur.
I think pearls are lovely, especially when you need something to clutch. ~ AzTheta
The Real World Can't Hear You ~ GC Troll
|

12-09-2006, 09:18 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Down the street
Posts: 9,791
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheerfulgreek
If it's so stupid why did you respond to it, and to answer your question, I wasn't looking asshole!
|
There are a lot of dumb threads with posts.
|

12-09-2006, 02:06 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,556
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheerfulgreek
If it's so stupid why did you respond to it, and to answer your question, I wasn't looking asshole!
|
lol! That's lettin 'em know
|

12-09-2006, 02:11 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 3,760
|
|
This is really being reported in the news....
NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Condoms designed to meet international size specifications are too big for many Indian men as their penises fall short of what manufacturers had anticipated, an Indian study has found.
The Indian Council of Medical Research, a leading state-run center, said its initial findings from a two-year study showed 60 percent of men in the financial capital Mumbai had penises about 2.4 cm (one inch) shorter than those condoms catered for.
For a further 30 percent, the difference was at least 5 cm (two inches). A poor fit meant the prophylactics often didn't do the job they were bought for, and led to some tearing or slipping off during use.
"One of the reasons for a failure of up to 20 percent (of condoms) is the association of the size of the condom to the erect penis," the council's Dr. Chander Puri told Reuters, adding another reason was couples often put them on in a hurry.
Puri said many men in India, which has the world's highest HIV positive caseload, were too shy to ask for condoms.
"We need more vending machines for condoms of different sizes so people can pick a condom with confidence that is suited to their needs," he said.
The Times of India reported the ICMR survey had studied 1,400 men between 18-50 years of age in cities like Mumbai and New Delhi as well as in rural areas in a report. It entitled its story "Indian men don't measure up."
|

12-10-2006, 06:23 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 447
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PiKA2001
This is really being reported in the news....
NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Condoms designed to meet international size specifications are too big for many Indian men as their penises fall short of what manufacturers had anticipated, an Indian study has found.
The Indian Council of Medical Research, a leading state-run center, said its initial findings from a two-year study showed 60 percent of men in the financial capital Mumbai had penises about 2.4 cm (one inch) shorter than those condoms catered for.
For a further 30 percent, the difference was at least 5 cm (two inches). A poor fit meant the prophylactics often didn't do the job they were bought for, and led to some tearing or slipping off during use.
"One of the reasons for a failure of up to 20 percent (of condoms) is the association of the size of the condom to the erect penis," the council's Dr. Chander Puri told Reuters, adding another reason was couples often put them on in a hurry.
Puri said many men in India, which has the world's highest HIV positive caseload, were too shy to ask for condoms.
"We need more vending machines for condoms of different sizes so people can pick a condom with confidence that is suited to their needs," he said.
The Times of India reported the ICMR survey had studied 1,400 men between 18-50 years of age in cities like Mumbai and New Delhi as well as in rural areas in a report. It entitled its story "Indian men don't measure up."
|
Hahaha I saw that on SNL tonight. That sucks.
How are they going to name the differently sized condoms, though? Extra large, large, medium, small, extra-small? Can you imagine? LMAO
|

12-09-2006, 12:46 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 33girl's campaign manager
Posts: 2,884
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrettyBoy
I know. This thread is about something so stupid we found something else to talk about.
Oh, by the way, did you find a black guy to screw yet? 
|
NASCAR is a good redneck sport
__________________
I'll take trainwreck for 100 Alex.
And Jesus speaketh, "do unto others as they did unto you because the bitches deserve it".
|

12-10-2006, 06:18 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 6,744
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by centaur532
NASCAR is a good redneck sport 
|
Not really.
__________________
The world system is in direct opposition to God and His Word — PrettyBoy The R35 GT-R doesn’t ask for permission. It takes control, rewrites the rules, and proves that AWD means All-Wheel Dominance — PrettyBoy
|

12-11-2006, 12:22 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 33girl's campaign manager
Posts: 2,884
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrettyBoy
Not really.
|
No it is. Period.
__________________
I'll take trainwreck for 100 Alex.
And Jesus speaketh, "do unto others as they did unto you because the bitches deserve it".
|

12-14-2006, 01:20 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 6,744
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by centaur532
No it is. Period.
|
No it's not. There are still some red neck fans, but it's not anywhere near as bad as it was years ago. NASCAR is a very different sport today.
__________________
The world system is in direct opposition to God and His Word — PrettyBoy The R35 GT-R doesn’t ask for permission. It takes control, rewrites the rules, and proves that AWD means All-Wheel Dominance — PrettyBoy
|

12-14-2006, 02:09 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Down the street
Posts: 9,791
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrettyBoy
No it's not. There are still some red neck fans, but it's not anywhere near as bad as it was years ago. NASCAR is a very different sport today.
|
It is different and a lot of that has to do with changing corporate sponsorship. There are more minority fans and so forth.
But it's still very much a white, working class sport.
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|