Not a Russian spy, he's a Muslin terrorist

[ann.coulter2]

Originally Posted by MysticCat

(A) Someone as well-educated as you certainly knows that the name of the newspaper is simply The Times.

(B) No where in the article to which you linked does The Times say or imply that "Litvinenko, the 'Russian spy' being portrayed in the NYTimes, WAPost, and their liberal cohorts as a victim of Putin and his commie comrads, may actually be a Muslim terrorist." In fact, to the extent that the article considers the question at all, the only implication is that he may have been the victim of terrorists, not a terrorist himself.

A - From other posts, it becomes pretty obvious that many of this site's posters get their news only from John Stewart, so 'London' is probably necessary.

B - Read between the lines, look for something else. Don't assume Litvinenko is a victim. Probably the truth will never be publicly known.