» GC Stats |
Members: 330,935
Threads: 115,704
Posts: 2,207,354
|
Welcome to our newest member, KeithNeexy |
|
 |

12-04-2006, 06:07 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: cobb
Posts: 5,367
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by macallan25
Why couldn't you make the bowl games the playoff games?
example:
Playoff Round 1:
Game 1: Cotton Bowl
Game 2: Holiday Bowl
Game 3: Gater Bowl
......as the playoffs get furhter along...you play in more prestigious bowl. Semifinals, Quarterfinals etc. could be played in the current BCS Bowls (Rose, Sugar, Orange, etc. )
|
i thought about that too, but it's a logistical nightmare.
then the people who really lose out in this are the fans. go to the gator bowl and then have to turn around and go to the rose bowl that next week?
__________________
my signature sucks
|

12-04-2006, 06:32 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,036
|
|
Thats true.....I think most people would just have to decide where they wanted to go for a game. I can't see just a ton of people being able to afford going to the Rose Bowl, Sugar Bowl, National Championship game, etc. Some could absolutely do it......but others, not so much. I mean, I went to our game last year with a bunch of fraternity borthers.....and it was by no means cheap.
|

12-04-2006, 07:00 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,255
|
|
Starang, I have no idea how you'd do it. Some sort of playoff is the solution. The only thing I'm saying is that the old system is sometimes better at recognizing teams than is the current system. Where we go from here, I don't know.
I think when we get to a playoff, we scrap the current BCS bowl system. Keep the Orange, the Sugar, and the Rose. Say there is an 8 team playoff. I think you you could do a few things. You could reward the higher teams with homefield advantage in the first round. You could use a regional system, playing a neutral site (but destroying the 1 vs. 8, 2 vs. 7 matchups). Its tough, people need to understand that if we're really gonna make this fair, some tradition is gonna have to be altered, and you might have a tough time seeing every game your team is playing in in person. However, if you the first 4 games at non-bowl sites, then you could have a rotating schedule of the final three games between the rose, sugar, and the orange.
I still think an 8 team playoff with 6 automatic bids for conference champions is the way to go. In actuality, I'd prefer it just be automatic bids, but I don't know how you could do that. That way, the solution is easy. Win your conference. Thats one of the reasons I don't care that Michigan got left out. They had a chance 3 weeks ago to get into the national championship game. They lost.
|

12-04-2006, 11:02 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,810
|
|
I'm in favor of giving OSU the National title and having Michigan and UF duke it out for 2nd. Even if UF beats OSU, OSU will still be the better team anyways. If there were a rematch, and Michigan won, OSU would still be the better team.
__________________
Proud to be a Macon Magnolia!
KLTC
|

12-04-2006, 11:13 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,036
|
|
That makes zero sense.
How do you say if OSU loses to Florida......then they are the better team? That is ridiculous. I heard that same thing after we won the Rose Bowl last year. "Well.....USC is still better." That is complete crap. If Michigan played Ohio State again, this time in Michigan, and won.....it doesn't say anything.
|

12-04-2006, 11:18 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: slightly east of insane
Posts: 1,237
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by macallan25
That makes zero sense.
How do you say if OSU loses to Florida......then they are the better team?
|
Agreed.
I'm always puzzled by people who insists that, whether a team wins or loses, they're still the better team. Judging by what? Clearly not by their ability to beat the other team.
__________________
Voices Strong. Hearts United.
|

12-05-2006, 12:28 AM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: the sleeper cab of my tractor trailer all over the 48
Posts: 2,723
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SigKapSweetie
Agreed.
I'm always puzzled by people who insists that, whether a team wins or loses, they're still the better team. Judging by what? Clearly not by their ability to beat the other team.
|
LOL
I don't see how Michigan folks can still realistically be angry. Your team was 11-1 without a conference championship. UF had to continue playing, and ultimately won their conference which lead to 12-1. Please...get over yourselves.
The BCS does suck overall. I think the playoff scenario would be a plausible solution. Although every single fan of a playoff team couldn't afford to travel to a final championship game, there are thousands of alumni they could definitely afford two trips in one day. *I'm surely not one of them!* Something has to be sacrificed to get a better system that fairly deterlmines the true national champion.
LOL @ fuckeyes
Last edited by jojapeach; 12-06-2006 at 12:15 PM.
Reason: No one addressed the hypothetical anyway... *shrug* GO SEC!
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|