Quote:
Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS
If the atheist group used religious-sattire or offensive words and images aimed at nonatheists to advertise? Perhaps.
As someone who has been on campuses with racial tension sparked by what many white people (not all b/c there were whites who protested, as well) thought was harmless fun because they never had to think about anyone other than themselves, I can say that a group of concerned students and/or administration is the determinant of what is a hinderance.
|
So, if I'm concerned over liberal protests on my campus, I can deem that a hinderance? Why do some people deserve authority to deem things offensive and thus not allowable, while others don't?
Threaded Mode
