» GC Stats |
Members: 329,874
Threads: 115,685
Posts: 2,207,020
|
Welcome to our newest member, zaluisopo5259 |
|
 |

09-16-2006, 03:10 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: NY
Posts: 8,594
|
|
They shouldn't be cops if they do stuff like that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin
They have these saferide vans in Norman, OK (where Oklahoma U is). It is not unheard of for the cops to pull over a saferid van and arrest the passengers for public intox.
|
|

09-16-2006, 04:02 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: I can't seem to keep track!
Posts: 5,807
|
|
Why not?
__________________
Click here for some helpful information about sorority recruitment and recommendations.
|

09-16-2006, 07:02 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Kansas City, Kansas USA
Posts: 23,586
|
|
Simply because if the van/bus driver has done nothing wrong, then they have no probable cause for stopping said vehicle!
No search warrent then have not right to check the passengers unless the passengers got rowdy and cause problems.
Kevin, you want to field this as a up and coming Laywer?
__________________
LCA
LX Z # 1
Alumni
|

09-17-2006, 07:26 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 37
|
|
If the Bus was taking the students to a Restaurant, and the Restaurant has the license to sell alcohol and the Restaurant is where it is purchased and consumed, then I fail to see where the school nor the SGA is responsible. The restaurant is responsible for the ID checking, etc. Not the person or entity (such as a school) that brought them there.
If you took an underage roommate to the bar, and they got served, and then the roommate left...who is going to get the citation from the ABC board? The bar, not the person that brought them there.
The school made a stupid call.
|

09-17-2006, 07:29 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 37
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Earp
Simply because if the van/bus driver has done nothing wrong, then they have no probable cause for stopping said vehicle!
No search warrent then have not right to check the passengers unless the passengers got rowdy and cause problems.
Kevin, you want to field this as a up and coming Laywer?
|
Even if the van was pulled over by the police, the driver doesn't get charged with a "contributing to the deliquency of a minor". The police have to prove where they got the alcohol from. If they didn't get it from the driver and the driver didn't purchase it, then they cannot charge the driver.
Think about it, if the driver was responsible, then every cabbie would stop picking up people that call for rides from bars b/c of the liability.
|

09-16-2006, 08:22 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,036
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by adpiucf
Why not?
|
Because that's bullshit, thats why. Why do that to a bunch of kids who are being completely responsible.
|

09-17-2006, 02:21 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Kansas City, Kansas USA
Posts: 23,586
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by macallan25
Because that's bullshit, thats why. Why do that to a bunch of kids who are being completely responsible.
|
Thank You and True That!
Oh hell, never mind, just give them a kick in the teeth anyway for being safe college kids!
__________________
LCA
LX Z # 1
Alumni
|

09-17-2006, 10:15 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mile High America
Posts: 17,088
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by macallan25
Because that's bullshit, thats why. Why do that to a bunch of kids who are being completely responsible.
|
OK. I think the school made a real mistake here.
I think the kids were being responsible.
They weren't being completely responsible, though. They were breaking the law.
I don't even agree with the law. I'd like to see the drinking age lowered to 18.
Still, it always seems to come back to the law, though.
__________________
Fraternally,
DeltAlum
DTD
The above is the opinion of the poster which may or may not be based in known facts and does not necessarily reflect the views of Delta Tau Delta or Greek Chat -- but it might.
|

09-17-2006, 11:29 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,036
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltAlum
OK. I think the school made a real mistake here.
I think the kids were being responsible.
They weren't being completely responsible, though. They were breaking the law.
I don't even agree with the law. I'd like to see the drinking age lowered to 18.
Still, it always seems to come back to the law, though.
|
So its against the law to go to a bar, drink, and ride back home?
|

09-17-2006, 11:52 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: I can't seem to keep track!
Posts: 5,807
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by macallan25
So its against the law to go to a bar, drink, and ride back home?
|
It is against the law to drink underage, yes.
__________________
Click here for some helpful information about sorority recruitment and recommendations.
|

09-18-2006, 04:37 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 447
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by adpiucf
It is against the law to drink underage, yes.
|
Wait what? I am officially confused.. the bus isn't transporting underage people to a bar and telling them to go drink or something. The bus is for all ages to go to the city.
|

09-18-2006, 12:28 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,036
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by adpiucf
It is against the law to drink underage, yes.
|
I don't think drinking underage was ever mentioned. I have taken SafeRide in Norman before, and I am 21. You can be of age and still get a PI...so yes, pulling over the vans and arresting the people in them is ridiculous and complete bullshit, especially when you are being responsible.
Its college, give me a break. Underage kids are going to drink. Why punish them for doing the right thing and not driving.
|

09-18-2006, 12:11 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mile High America
Posts: 17,088
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by macallan25
So its against the law to go to a bar, drink, and ride back home?
|
"This week, the school has ordered this stopped, claiming it was allowing underage students access to alcohol."
If they're underage, yes.
__________________
Fraternally,
DeltAlum
DTD
The above is the opinion of the poster which may or may not be based in known facts and does not necessarily reflect the views of Delta Tau Delta or Greek Chat -- but it might.
Last edited by DeltAlum; 09-18-2006 at 12:14 PM.
|

09-18-2006, 12:13 PM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,563
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltAlum
If you're underage, yes.
|
So if you drive a cab and pick up someone drunk, you're supposed to card them to make sure they're of age?
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
|

09-18-2006, 02:12 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 355
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltAlum
"This week, the school has ordered this stopped, claiming it was allowing underage students access to alcohol."
If they're underage, yes.
|
Not to mention the biggest flaw in their statement was to assume that the bus gave access to alcohol to any students in general. It's the restaurant's responsibility. It has nothing to do with the bus.
it's unfair to cancel the system, because by doing so, they are also taking away the previlage to those who really need the system for "non-drunk" reasons.
I could be wrong, but are they trying to cut the cost? because it could cost a lot for the drivers to drive night shifts, right?
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|