Quote:
Originally Posted by honeychile
Yes, Family Bibles are considered as proofs - WHEN they are contemporary with the information. You can't go out and buy an old Bible, list your family's information, and expect it to be accepted.
I'm hoping to not answer any further questions, as I have said that I had an issue of genealogical interest, not political. No, I'm not a big fan of the President, but it has nothing to do with his race.
|
Yes I know that it has to be contemporary, but still the principle is "It's the Family Bible, not a birth certificate."
Anyway moving on, I'm not questioning your reasoning they are your own. Yet I do question when people use their own criteria for burden of proof as being superior than the laws and statutes of the US Government and the rights of its states. If Hawaii only wanted to release that form as proof and no other state had an issue, but just a bunch of fringe people then it works for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elephant Walk
Fantastic.
I bet you have a hard time remembering to breathe.
Which sock puppet corresponds to "I know, bitch"?
|
You tell me I'm just waiting.
Threaded Mode
