Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
As long you can no longer claim that you've never heard of it.
Correct. The purpose behind the existence of these uni-sex institutions is the same regardless of people's opinions of their religious or non-religious; and accredited or non-accredited foundations.
|
(I still consider its use to describe male students to be so unusual as to be irrelevant)
Actually I disagree, I don't consider seminaries to be educationally equivalent to other schools and not at all comparable to say Loyola or Liberty University. Additionally, accreditation matters as evidenced by the school shutting down following loss of it's accreditation. And using them as an example of how men's education is still privileged misses the mark in my opinion.
Threaded Mode
