Quote:
Originally Posted by Jen
Jeff's Survivor blog at EW said they chose to do it because of a precedent set when Janu quit back in Palau. I think that's a precedent it's okay to break.
|
Well, I think his point was that it wasn't fair to the remaining players to break the precedent mid-game because they could have relied on the precedent in their jury strategy (if they have one).
He also indicated that the rules may be changed before the next season. I can see the reasoning that if the rules are going to be changed, it has to be before the game starts.
As for a smaller jury, if it's a final three (as Purplekelly indicated) and the quitters aren't on the jury, that would be a jury of just 7. I can see not wanting that.
Threaded Mode
