Quote:
Originally Posted by BluPhire
Untrue and spoken like somebody who's never been on the other side of discrimination.
|
Wait . . . what? I was making fun of your preferential (and likely incorrect) application of a global principal to an innocuous sentence - here's a synopsis of what happened:
POSTER: "Other nations adopted gay marriage much sooner than we did."
YOU: "BUT YOU CAN'T PROVE HOMOSEXUALS ARE BETTER OFF THERE AS A RESULT!"
I mean . . . you're arguing a point nobody made. That's all I was saying, duder. Feel free to rage against the machine though.
Quote:
|
Face Value gets folks killed all the time because they never dig deeper to find out the truth in life.
|
Now, at what point do you think I said "Live your life at face-value alone, free of a critical eye"? Honestly, nobody made ANY argument that Argentina is a "greater nation" than the US or that they were miles ahead in gay rights as a whole - just that they did the marriage thing first. Ahead. In temporal terms. While you should look at society, social norms, etc. with a critical eye, sometimes it's ok to view a throw-away sentence for what it's worth, and your blood pressure might even drop.
Words have meaning. And understanding that meaning literally doesn't kill people "all the time" at all.
Quote:
|
That's how Rwanda and now Darfur can get away with genocide.
|
Yes, they get away with genocide because message board posters say things like "well, the ethnic minorities got water from Clinton - they were way ahead." That's how Darfur happened, totally.
It's kind of ironic that you're oversimplifying after accusing me of gross oversimplification.
Let's try again, though - things that are demonstrably true: other nations are ahead of the United States in terms of adopting marriage rights for homosexuals.
Things that are not demonstrably true: Rwanda happened because people assumed small advances in marriage rights for a minority indicated a larger trend, so folks looked the other way while millions were murdered.
Occam's Razor. For real.
EDIT: After re-reading, this might come off as harsh and I really don't mean it to be (happy hour wins again) - I feel what you're saying, but think about what you're accusing me of here, and realize exactly how limited my point (and the original point) really is, and I think you'll see that you're a bit beyond the pale.